hi! thanks for sending this. can you explain more about the motivation? I'm not personally familiar with detsys-ts, nor with how stable the branch you'd like to move it to is
yeah I think you're right, on closer read (I find it hard to see the context of changes on forgejo, but oh well)
good. yes. trailing whitespace bothers me beyond reason. please merge this.
yes, I agree with that caveat. also, we should still mention the existence of the module, right?
yes absolutely, sounds great, go ahead and merge it (fix that conflict of course)
Huh. Thank you. I think I understand how my test case wound up not hitting that... I had a lot of trouble at first separating out the builtin semantics from the chroot, since they both restrict…
That doesn't seem consistent with the tests I did last night, but it's possible that I wasn't testing in a way that drew out the actual behavior. At any rate I think there's more than enough…
oh. huh. interesting... so the two concepts of pure evaluation are different. drat :) but that makes sense.
ah oops, here's the error message
fetching path input 'path:/nix/store/f6lbic2a83c51ygb2czksw9gv8x6w5wg-source'
this derivation will be built:
/nix/store/i4zd0iz237yjjkk1glqcxv0c32jpavb…
um - I think this was clear in chat but in case it's not, I'm still very grateful that you raised this for discussion and filed an issue about it
as I said over in the chat, I'm hesitant.
the goal is an admirable one, but the details look like kind of a nightmare and I'm not convinced this belongs in the nix executable at all. it seems…