lix-project/lix-website
3
1
Fork 14
Code Issues 3 Pull requests 5 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: add nixpkgs variant to switch to Lix #28

Closed
raito wants to merge 1 commit from nixpkgs-variant into main
pull from: nixpkgs-variant
merge into: lix-project:main
Conversation 2 Commits 1 Files changed 2 +197 -105
raito commented 2024-06-09 13:26:21 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Let's document the Nixpkgs variant for the installation.

Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius raito@lix.systems

Let's document the Nixpkgs variant for the installation. Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius <raito@lix.systems>
raito added 1 commit 2024-06-09 13:26:25 +00:00 
Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius <raito@lix.systems>
asqiir reviewed 2024-06-09 14:37:08 +00:00
content/add-to-config.md
@ -8,3 +8,1 @@
If you have an existing configuration on **NixOS** or **nix-darwin**, the easiest way
to switch to Lix is currently by using our provided _NixOS module_. Fortunately, this
usually means adding only a couple of lines to your configuration.
If you have an existing configuration on **NixOS** or **nix-darwin** with version 24.05 or older, you can use Lix from Nixpkgs.
asqiir commented 2024-06-09 14:37:08 +00:00
First-time contributor
Copy link

In the matrix chat, it was mentioned that this is supposed to be read as 24.05 or older is meant as ≥ 24.05.
Afaict this should be changed to "24.05 or newer".

In the matrix chat, it was mentioned that this is supposed to be read as `24.05 or older is meant as ≥ 24.05`. Afaict this should be changed to "24.05 or newer".
irenes commented 2024-06-12 19:51:10 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

yes, I agree with that caveat. also, we should still mention the existence of the module, right?

yes, I agree with that caveat. also, we should still mention the existence of the module, right?
asqiir commented 2024-06-12 20:30:18 +00:00
First-time contributor
Copy link

Module?
I thought the module stuff is already there, and the new part is just explaining that nix.package=pkgs.lix; is enough

Module? I thought the module stuff is already there, and the new part is just explaining that `nix.package=pkgs.lix;` is enough
irenes commented 2024-06-12 20:53:33 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

yeah I think you're right, on closer read (I find it hard to see the context of changes on forgejo, but oh well)

yeah I think you're right, on closer read (I find it hard to see the context of changes on forgejo, but oh well)
irenes requested review from irenes 2024-06-12 19:50:37 +00:00
jade commented 2024-06-20 20:50:57 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

WHOOPS i wrote this independently and merged it to main. Someone should check through this and verify my work.

WHOOPS i wrote this independently and merged it to main. Someone should check through this and verify my work.
jade commented 2024-06-20 21:08:10 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Alright I think this is redundant though feel free to change the thing that got committed as desired :)

Alright I think this is redundant though feel free to change the thing that got committed as desired :)
jade closed this pull request 2024-06-20 21:08:10 +00:00

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
irenes
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: lix-project/lix-website#28
No description provided.
Delete branch "nixpkgs-variant"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?