For now we just need to put the release notes in the final spot. We will
have to fix the date on both 2.90 and 2.91 branches, but such as it is.
Release created with releng/create_release.xsh
Closes: lix-project/lix#318
Change-Id: I38e79b40e7f632c8a286f2f09865a84dc93eca90
This doesn't comprehensively fix everything outdated in the manual, or
make the manual greatly better, but it does note down where at least
jade noticed it was wrong, and it does fix all the instances of
referencing Nix to conform to the style guide to the best of our
ability.
A lot of things have been commented out for being wrong, and there are
three types of FIXME introduced:
- FIXME(Lix): generically Lix needs to fix it
- FIXME(Qyriad): re lix-project/lix#215
- FIXME(meson): docs got outdated by meson changes and need rewriting
I did fix a bunch of it that I could, but there could certainly be
mistakes and this is definitely just an incremental improvement.
Fixes: lix-project/lix#266
Change-Id: I5993c4603d7f026a887089fce77db08394362135
mdbook has the unfortunate habit of creating stub files for chapters it
can't find on disk. turn off this helpful feature as it masks errors in
the summary file, and fix a recently introduced instance of this error.
Change-Id: I10d86aac0489c9c494bd5c8a50047415f4d4b18d
Part of #7672
My main motivation is to be able to use `nix.checkConfig`[1]. This
doesn't work with Lix currently since the module uses `nix show-config`
if the Nix version is <2.20pre and `nix config show` otherwise. I think
this is the only instance where nixpkgs checks for which Nix commands
exist that affects us now, so I figured we could just perform the rename
here as well[2] and still provide the current version number[3].
I don't have a strong opinion on whether to deprecate `nix show-config`,
the warning is added there automatically.
(cherry picked from commit f300e11b056dea414d7d77bbc6e5a7dc5d9ddd41)
[1] https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options.html#opt-nix.checkConfig
[2] I should add that I don't use the "official" ways of installing Lix
because using the flake directly and callPackaging it seemed to fit
better into my workflow: I already have a little mess to make
sure Hydra from the flake uses the correct pkgs.nix and I didn't
want to complicate it further while keeping a single package-set I
can build in CI. Don't get me wrong, I think such a module for a
quick-start is very important, just giving context on why I bother
in the first place :)
[3] When we go public, I think it's worth considering to add support in
nixpkgs itself for Lix.
Change-Id: I47b4239b05cbeda3c370d2fa56ea768b768768ac
this would make meson build compatibility unnecessarily hard and
the cli does not change often enough to justify this complexity.
Change-Id: I17b1870cdf8538feeaa01a9945db97af2175a642
