the-distro/infra
8
1
Fork 8
Code Issues 37 Pull requests 9 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: finer-grained ACLs for server accesses #90

Merged
raito merged 1 commit from acls into main 2024-10-05 14:25:29 +00:00
Conversation 7 Commits 1 Files changed 4 +118 -15
raito commented 2024-08-01 21:46:09 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

In the process of adding multi-tenant infrastructure, it seems relevant
to add finer-grained ACLs.

Related to #89.

Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius masterancpp@gmail.com

In the process of adding multi-tenant infrastructure, it seems relevant to add finer-grained ACLs. Related to https://git.lix.systems/the-distro/infra/issues/89. Signed-off-by: Raito Bezarius <masterancpp@gmail.com>
raito commented 2024-08-01 21:50:58 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Confirmed via dry-activation that this doesn't remove all SSH keys from the universe: /nix/store/bwj5af2f257azmir090g08d3jy2hvnma-root-authorized_keys on public01.

Confirmed via `dry-activation` that this doesn't remove all SSH keys from the universe: `/nix/store/bwj5af2f257azmir090g08d3jy2hvnma-root-authorized_keys` on public01.
raito changed title from WIP: feat: finer-grained ACLs for server accesses to feat: finer-grained ACLs for server accesses 2024-08-01 22:02:31 +00:00
yu-re-ka commented 2024-08-01 22:12:12 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Do we need all those invisible unicode characters?

Do we need all those invisible unicode characters?
raito commented 2024-08-02 14:35:21 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Do we need all those invisible unicode characters?

we don't but i keep generating them for no reason

> Do we need all those invisible unicode characters? we don't but i keep generating them for no reason
🫠 1
yu-re-ka commented 2024-08-02 18:10:39 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Well, other than that it looks a bit convoluted in how it reverses the group -> users and user -> groups mapping, but I guess it's fine

Well, other than that it looks a bit convoluted in how it reverses the group -> users and user -> groups mapping, but I guess it's fine
yu-re-ka approved these changes 2024-08-02 19:43:21 +00:00
raito commented 2024-08-06 15:00:59 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Well, other than that it looks a bit convoluted in how it reverses the group -> users and user -> groups mapping, but I guess it's fine

Hm, if you think it's better to go in another direction, I'm all for it ; it doesn't have to be merged that fast.

> Well, other than that it looks a bit convoluted in how it reverses the group -> users and user -> groups mapping, but I guess it's fine Hm, if you think it's better to go in another direction, I'm all for it ; it doesn't have to be merged that fast.
raito commented 2024-10-05 14:12:46 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

I re-inverted the logic, so it's less convoluted I hope. I will merge now because this has been staying for too long.

I re-inverted the logic, so it's less convoluted I hope. I will merge now because this has been staying for too long.
❤️ 1
raito merged commit 6d3e14ec27 into main 2024-10-05 14:25:29 +00:00
raito deleted branch acls 2024-10-05 14:25:29 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
yu-re-ka
Labels
Clear labels   
Compat/Breaking

Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Difficulty
Architectural
Requires changes in multiple pieces of the stack: the Nix interpreter, etc.

  
Difficulty
Easy
Infrastructure beginner friendly tasks

  
Difficulty
Hard
Requires prior knowledge, research and design

  
Help Wanted

Looking for a first task to pick? This one is looking for somefew to do it as well!

  
Kind
Bug
Something is not working

  
Kind
Documentation
Documentation changes

  
Kind
Enhancement
Improve existing functionality

  
Kind
Feature
New functionality

  
Kind
Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Security

This is a security issue

  
Silenced Alert

This issue was created to track a silenced alert which needs remediation work.

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
Status
Postponed
We can do this later

  
Tracking Issue

Umbrella issue of many things at the same time

No labels
Compat/Breaking
Difficulty
Architectural
Difficulty
Easy
Difficulty
Hard
Help Wanted
Kind
Bug
Kind
Documentation
Kind
Enhancement
Kind
Feature
Kind
Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Security
Silenced Alert
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Status
Postponed
Tracking Issue
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: the-distro/infra#90
No description provided.
Delete branch "acls"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?