c287d73121
Following discussion with Shea and Graham. It's a big enough change from the last release. Also, from a semver perspective, 2.0 makes more sense because we did remove some interfaces (like nix-pull/nix-push).
28 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
<!--
|
|
|
|
# Filing a Nix issue
|
|
|
|
*WAIT* Are you sure you're filing your issue in the right repository?
|
|
|
|
We appreciate you taking the time to tell us about issues you encounter, but routing the issue to the right place will get you help sooner and save everyone time.
|
|
|
|
This is the Nix repository, and issues here should be about Nix the build and package management *_tool_*.
|
|
|
|
If you have a problem with a specific package on NixOS or when using Nix, you probably want to file an issue with _nixpkgs_, whose issue tracker is over at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues.
|
|
|
|
Examples of _Nix_ issues:
|
|
|
|
- Nix segfaults when I run `nix-build -A blahblah`
|
|
- The Nix language needs a new builtin: `builtins.foobar`
|
|
- Regression in the behavior of `nix-env` in Nix 2.0
|
|
|
|
Examples of _nixpkgs_ issues:
|
|
|
|
- glibc is b0rked on aarch64
|
|
- chromium in NixOS doesn't support U2F but google-chrome does!
|
|
- The OpenJDK package on macOS is missing a key component
|
|
|
|
Chances are if you're a newcomer to the Nix world, you'll probably want the [nixpkgs tracker](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues). It also gets a lot more eyeball traffic so you'll probably get a response a lot more quickly.
|
|
|
|
-->
|