Fix GitHub API to use the API versioning information correctly #255
Labels
No labels
Affects/CppNix
Affects/Nightly
Affects/Only nightly
Affects/Stable
Area/build-packaging
Area/cli
Area/evaluator
Area/fetching
Area/flakes
Area/language
Area/lix ci
Area/nix-eval-jobs
Area/profiles
Area/protocol
Area/releng
Area/remote-builds
Area/repl
Area/repl/debugger
Area/store
bug
Context
contributors
Context
drive-by
Context
maintainers
Context
RFD
crash 💥
Cross Compilation
devx
docs
Downstream Dependents
E/easy
E/hard
E/help wanted
E/reproducible
E/requires rearchitecture
imported
Language/Bash
Language/C++
Language/NixLang
Language/Python
Language/Rust
Needs Langver
OS/Linux
OS/macOS
performance
regression
release-blocker
stability
Status
blocked
Status
invalid
Status
postponed
Status
wontfix
testing
testing/flakey
Topic/Large Scale Installations
ux
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lix-project/lix#255
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
in
src/libfetchers/github.cc
we do not specify the github api version. this is sorta busted but also it will just default to 2022-11-28 if not specified. it would be very easy to fix though. see:https://docs.github.com/en/rest/about-the-rest-api/api-versions?apiVersion=2022-11-28
the thing that's weird is that we ask for api v3 on on-prem instances and don't specify for cloud github.com.
From what I understand, the
v3
in the URL for on-prem instances is an old versioning for the REST API that is still leaking through, and not related to the currently used date-based API versioning scheme (2022-11-28
).So the version header should be added for both on-prem and cloud, and the
v3
is just a fixed part of the URL for on-prem.i think Artemis(not t) is working on this, based on fedi posts. just fyi if anyone else is looking into picking it up.
This issue was mentioned on Gerrit on the following CLs: