lix-project/flake-compat
16
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 13 Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add MIT license #23

Merged
roberth merged 2 commits from issue-16-mit-license into master 2021-08-01 15:35:37 +00:00
Conversation 10 Commits 2 Files changed 2 +20 -7
roberth commented 2021-07-07 15:34:21 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

An open source license protects contributors and users. Closes #16.

I assume the omission of a license was an oversight, so I would like to help by providing a suggestion and taking care of the process.

For the license I propose MIT, same as Nixpkgs.

@edolstra @Ma27 @zanculmarktum @cole-h @matthewbauer @nlewo @zimbatm please comment to confirm:

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

Of course you are free not to agree. Doing so would be bad for the community though. See https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/

cc issue respondents @alyssais @clayrisser @pombredanne @zhaofengli

An open source license protects contributors and users. Closes #16. I assume the omission of a license was an oversight, so I would like to help by providing a suggestion and taking care of the process. For the license I propose MIT, same as Nixpkgs. @edolstra @Ma27 @zanculmarktum @cole-h @matthewbauer @nlewo @zimbatm please comment to confirm: I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license. ------ Of course you are free not to agree. Doing so would be bad for the community though. See https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/ cc issue respondents @alyssais @clayrisser @pombredanne @zhaofengli
👍 1 👀 1
roberth commented 2021-07-07 15:34:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
Ma27 commented 2021-07-07 15:48:23 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
nlewo commented 2021-07-07 15:48:25 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
cole-h commented 2021-07-07 15:50:37 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
matthewbauer commented 2021-07-07 16:22:29 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
zimbatm commented 2021-07-07 19:42:47 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
roberth commented 2021-07-28 14:03:17 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I've sent a reminder and explanation to @zanculmarktum.

I've sent a reminder and explanation to @zanculmarktum.
roberth commented 2021-08-01 12:18:26 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I've reverted the unlicensed commit. It may not have been "creative work" under copyright, but better safe than sorry. Also, no hard feelings.

Could someone implement tarball support on this branch, without looking at earlier versions or the "Revert unlicensed contribution" commit? ie "clean room" reimplementation. I estimate that it can be done in well under 30 minutes. I'd do it myself if it wasn't for the fact that I've already worked on that code.

I've reverted the unlicensed commit. It may not have been "creative work" under copyright, but better safe than sorry. Also, no hard feelings. Could someone implement tarball support on this branch, without looking at earlier versions or the "Revert unlicensed contribution" commit? ie "clean room" reimplementation. I estimate that it can be done in well under 30 minutes. I'd do it myself if it wasn't for the fact that I've already worked on that code.
edolstra commented 2021-08-01 15:37:04 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I don't think a "clean room" implementation is necessary since this contribution is "de minimis" and can't really be implemented in another (obvious) way.

I don't think a "clean room" implementation is necessary since this contribution is "de minimis" and can't really be implemented in another (obvious) way.
👍 3
zanculmarktum commented 2021-08-02 03:46:01 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.

I agree to license my contributions to flake-compat under the terms of the MIT license.
👍 2 ❤️ 2
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: lix-project/flake-compat#23
No description provided.
Delete branch "issue-16-mit-license"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?