forked from lix-project/lix
752f967c0f
I just had a colleague get confused by the previous phrase for good reason. "valid" sounds like an *objective* criterion, e.g. and *invalid signature* would be one that would be trusted by no one, e.g. because it misformatted or something. What is actually going is that there might be a signature which is perfectly valid to *someone else*, but not to the user, because they don't trust the corresponding public key. This is a *subjective* criterion, because it depends on the arbitrary and personal choice of which public keys to trust. I therefore think "trustworthy" is a better adjective to use. Whether something is worthy of trust is clearly subjective, and then "trust" within that word nicely evokes `trusted-public-keys` and friends. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| build-remote | ||
| libcmd | ||
| libexpr | ||
| libfetchers | ||
| libmain | ||
| libstore | ||
| libutil | ||
| nix | ||
| nix-build | ||
| nix-channel | ||
| nix-collect-garbage | ||
| nix-copy-closure | ||
| nix-env | ||
| nix-instantiate | ||
| nix-store | ||
| resolve-system-dependencies | ||
| toml11 | ||