Support ofborg comments inline with other text
The old design of the parser treated all whitespace the same and mandated that `grahamcofborg` (plus the `@`) be the first token in the text. This allowed for some ridiculous but command calls: grahamcofborg build foo bar baz This used to become a build instruction for foo, bar, and baz. After this change, it is just an instruction for building foo. This allows for comments for people to be intertwined with comments for the bot: grahamcofborg build foo Let's see what happens! Before this would unintentionally become a build instruction for `foo`, `Let's`, `see`, `what`, `happens!`, and is now only going to build `foo`. Additionally, this comment would do nothing: Let's see what happens! grahamcofborg build foo Or a more real case where people expected this to work: /cc grahamc for ^^ GrahamcOfBorg eval This will continue to not produce a build instruction, because grahamcofborg must be the first word of a line: foo bar grahamcofborg build foo Note: I've removed `@`s from all usernames to avoid accidental email.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4dea8198a0
commit
162cd9a982
15
README.md
15
README.md
|
@ -9,7 +9,10 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Commands
|
||||
|
||||
1. To trigger the bot, the comment _must_ start with a case
|
||||
The comment parser is line-based, so comments can be interleaved with
|
||||
instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
1. To trigger the bot, the line _must_ start with a case
|
||||
insensitive version of `@GrahamcOfBorg`.
|
||||
2. To use multiple commands, insert a bit of whitespace and then your
|
||||
new command.
|
||||
|
@ -61,21 +64,25 @@ or even:
|
|||
@grahamcofborg build list of attrs @grahamcofborg eval
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This will _not_ work:
|
||||
This will also work:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
looks good to me!
|
||||
@grahamcofborg build list of attrs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Also this is bad:
|
||||
And this is fine:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@grahamcofborg build list of attrs
|
||||
looks good to me!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
as it'll try to build `list` `of` `attrs` `looks` `good` `to` `me!`.
|
||||
This is will build `list`, `of`, `attrs`, `looks`, `good`, `to`, `me!`:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@grahamcofborg build list of attrs looks good to me!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# How does OfBorg call nix-build?
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
|
|||
|
||||
pub fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<Vec<Instruction>> {
|
||||
let instructions: Vec<Instruction> = text.lines()
|
||||
.map(|s| match parse_line(s) {
|
||||
Some(instructions) => instructions,
|
||||
None => vec![]
|
||||
})
|
||||
.fold(vec![], |mut collector, mut inst| {
|
||||
collector.append(&mut inst);
|
||||
collector
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if instructions.len() == 0 {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return Some(instructions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn parse_line(text: &str) -> Option<Vec<Instruction>> {
|
||||
let tokens: Vec<String> = text.split_whitespace()
|
||||
.map(|s| s.to_owned()).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -67,6 +85,14 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
assert_eq!(None, parse(""));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn valid_trailing_instruction() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Some(vec![Instruction::Eval]),
|
||||
parse("/cc @grahamc for ^^
|
||||
@GrahamcOfBorg eval")
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn bogus_comment() {
|
||||
|
@ -107,6 +133,31 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
@grahamcofborg build foo"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn complex_comment_with_paragraphs() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Some(vec![
|
||||
Instruction::Build(Subset::Nixpkgs, vec![
|
||||
String::from("bar"),
|
||||
]),
|
||||
Instruction::Eval,
|
||||
Instruction::Build(Subset::Nixpkgs, vec![
|
||||
String::from("foo"),
|
||||
])
|
||||
]),
|
||||
parse("
|
||||
I like where you're going with this PR, so let's try it out!
|
||||
|
||||
@grahamcofborg build bar
|
||||
|
||||
I noticed though that the target branch was broken, which should be fixed. Let's eval again.
|
||||
|
||||
@grahamcofborg eval
|
||||
|
||||
Also, just in case, let's try foo
|
||||
@grahamcofborg build foo"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn build_and_eval_comment() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Some(vec![
|
||||
|
@ -122,8 +173,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
fn build_comment() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Some(vec![Instruction::Build(Subset::Nixpkgs, vec![
|
||||
String::from("foo"),
|
||||
String::from("bar"),
|
||||
String::from("baz")
|
||||
String::from("bar")
|
||||
])]),
|
||||
parse("@GrahamCOfBorg build foo bar
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -160,28 +210,6 @@ baz"));
|
|||
parse("@grahamcofborg build foo bar baz"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn build_whitespace_disregarded() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Some(vec![Instruction::Build(Subset::Nixpkgs, vec![
|
||||
String::from("foo"),
|
||||
String::from("bar"),
|
||||
String::from("baz")
|
||||
])]),
|
||||
parse("
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@grahamcofborg
|
||||
build foo
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bar baz
|
||||
|
||||
"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn build_comment_lower_package_case_retained() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Some(vec![Instruction::Build(Subset::Nixpkgs, vec![
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue