From 78e886bc5fd9e4d85f8503799540c0b71bb270be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Gagarin Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:59:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] refine the maintainer's process to unblock discussions more quickly this addresses that we're too often running into open-ended discussions about attempts to solve problems where neither the problem nor the solution is well-understood enough to make decisions in a reasonable amount of time. this also prevents us from doing more work asynchronously. Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing --- maintainers/README.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/maintainers/README.md b/maintainers/README.md index 0d520cb0c..8eeb47e8b 100644 --- a/maintainers/README.md +++ b/maintainers/README.md @@ -96,8 +96,10 @@ What constitutes a trivial pull request is up to maintainers' judgement. Pull requests and issues that are deemed important and controversial are discussed by the team during discussion meetings. This may be where the merit of the change itself or the implementation strategy is contested by a team member. +Whenever the discussion opens up questions about the process or this team's goals, this may indicate that the change is too large in scope. +In that case it is taken off the board to be reconsidered by the author or broken down into smaller pieces that are less far-reaching and can be reviewed independently. -As a general guideline, the order of items is determined as follows: +As a general guideline, the order of items to discuss is determined as follows: - Prioritise pull requests over issues