nrabulinski/lix
0
0
Fork 0
forked from lix-project/lix
Code Pull requests Activity

* Support multiple outputs. A derivation can declare multiple outputs

Browse source 
by setting the ‘outputs’ attribute.  For example:

    stdenv.mkDerivation {
      name = "aterm-2.5";

      src = ...;

      outputs = [ "out" "tools" "dev" ];

      configureFlags = "--bindir=$(tools)/bin --includedir=$(dev)/include";
    }

  This derivation creates three outputs, named like this:

    /nix/store/gcnqgllbh01p3d448q8q6pzn2nc2gpyl-aterm-2.5
    /nix/store/gjf1sgirwfnrlr0bdxyrwzpw2r304j02-aterm-2.5-tools
    /nix/store/hp6108bqfgxvza25nnxfs7kj88xi2vdx-aterm-2.5-dev

  That is, the symbolic name of the output is suffixed to the store
  path (except for the ‘out’ output).  Each path is passed to the
  builder through the corresponding environment variable, e.g.,
  ${tools}.

  The main reason for multiple outputs is to allow parts of a package
  to be distributed and garbage-collected separately.  For instance,
  most packages depend on Glibc for its libraries, but don't need its
  header files.  If these are separated into different store paths,
  then a package that depends on the Glibc libraries only causes the
  libraries and not the headers to be downloaded.

  The main problem with multiple outputs is that if one output exists
  while the others have been garbage-collected (or never downloaded in
  the first place), and we want to rebuild the other outputs, then
  this isn't possible because we can't clobber a valid output (it
  might be in active use).  This currently gives an error message
  like:

    error: derivation `/nix/store/1s9zw4c8qydpjyrayxamx2z7zzp5pcgh-aterm-2.5.drv' is blocked by its output paths

  There are two solutions: 1) Do the build in a chroot.  Then we don't
  need to overwrite the existing path.  2) Use hash rewriting (see the
  ASE-2005 paper).  Scary but it should work.

  This is not finished yet.  There is not yet an easy way to refer to
  non-default outputs in Nix expressions.  Also, mutually recursive
  outputs aren't detected yet and cause the garbage collector to
  crash.
This commit is contained in:
Eelco Dolstra 2011-07-18 23:31:03 +00:00
parent d9a5959139
commit d329c3ea9d
1 changed files with 84 additions and 45 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

103
src/libexpr/primops.cc
View file

@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ static void prim_derivationStrict(EvalState & state, Value * * args, Value & v)
string outputHash, outputHashAlgo;
bool outputHashRecursive = false;
StringSet outputs;
outputs.insert("out");
foreach (Bindings::iterator, i, *args[0]->attrs) {
string key = i->name;
startNest(nest, lvlVomit, format("processing attribute `%1%'") % key);
@ -368,6 +371,24 @@ static void prim_derivationStrict(EvalState & state, Value * * args, Value & v)
else if (s == "flat") outputHashRecursive = false;
else throw EvalError(format("invalid value `%1%' for `outputHashMode' attribute") % s);
}
else if (key == "outputs") {
Strings tmp = tokenizeString(s);
outputs.clear();
foreach (Strings::iterator, j, tmp) {
if (outputs.find(*j) != outputs.end())
throw EvalError(format("duplicate derivation output `%1%'") % *j);
/* !!! Check whether *j is a valid attribute
name. */
/* Derivations cannot be named ‘drv’, because
then we'd have an attribute ‘drvPath’ in
the resulting set. */
if (*j == "drv")
throw EvalError(format("invalid derivation output name `drv'") % *j);
outputs.insert(*j);
}
if (outputs.empty())
throw EvalError("derivation cannot have an empty set of outputs");
}
}
} catch (Error & e) {
@ -424,11 +445,29 @@ static void prim_derivationStrict(EvalState & state, Value * * args, Value & v)
if (drv.platform == "")
throw EvalError("required attribute `system' missing");
/* If an output hash was given, check it. */
Path outPath;
if (outputHash == "")
outputHashAlgo = "";
else {
/* Check whether the derivation name is valid. */
checkStoreName(drvName);
if (isDerivation(drvName))
throw EvalError(format("derivation names are not allowed to end in `%1%'")
% drvExtension);
/* Construct the "masked" store derivation, which is the final one
except that in the list of outputs, the output paths are empty,
and the corresponding environment variables have an empty
value. This ensures that changes in the set of output names do
get reflected in the hash.
However, for fixed-output derivations, we can compute the
output path directly, so we don't need this. */
bool fixedOnly = true;
foreach (StringSet::iterator, i, outputs) {
if (*i != "out" || outputHash == "") {
drv.env[*i] = "";
drv.outputs[*i] = DerivationOutput("", "", "");
fixedOnly = false;
} else {
/* If an output hash was given, check it, and compute the
output path. */
HashType ht = parseHashType(outputHashAlgo);
if (ht == htUnknown)
throw EvalError(format("unknown hash algorithm `%1%'") % outputHashAlgo);
@ -444,33 +483,29 @@ static void prim_derivationStrict(EvalState & state, Value * * args, Value & v)
% outputHash % outputHashAlgo);
string s = outputHash;
outputHash = printHash(h);
outPath = makeFixedOutputPath(outputHashRecursive, ht, h, drvName);
if (outputHashRecursive) outputHashAlgo = "r:" + outputHashAlgo;
Path outPath = makeFixedOutputPath(outputHashRecursive, ht, h, drvName);
drv.env[*i] = outPath;
drv.outputs[*i] = DerivationOutput(outPath, outputHashAlgo, outputHash);
}
}
/* Check whether the derivation name is valid. */
checkStoreName(drvName);
if (isDerivation(drvName))
throw EvalError(format("derivation names are not allowed to end in `%1%'")
% drvExtension);
/* Construct the "masked" derivation store expression, which is
the final one except that in the list of outputs, the output
paths are empty, and the corresponding environment variables
have an empty value. This ensures that changes in the set of
output names do get reflected in the hash. */
drv.env["out"] = "";
drv.outputs["out"] = DerivationOutput("", outputHashAlgo, outputHash);
/* Use the masked derivation expression to compute the output
path. */
if (outPath == "")
outPath = makeStorePath("output:out", hashDerivationModulo(state, drv), drvName);
/* Construct the final derivation store expression. */
drv.env["out"] = outPath;
drv.outputs["out"] =
DerivationOutput(outPath, outputHashAlgo, outputHash);
path. !!! Isn't it a potential security problem that the name
of each output path (including the suffix) isn't taken into
account? For instance, changing the suffix for one path
(‘i->first == "out" ...’) doesn't affect the hash of the
others. Is that exploitable? */
if (!fixedOnly) {
Hash h = hashDerivationModulo(state, drv);
foreach (DerivationOutputs::iterator, i, drv.outputs)
if (i->second.path == "") {
Path outPath = makeStorePath("output:" + i->first, h,
drvName + (i->first == "out" ? "" : "-" + i->first));
drv.env[i->first] = outPath;
i->second.path = outPath;
}
}
/* Write the resulting term into the Nix store directory. */
Path drvPath = writeDerivation(drv, drvName);
@ -479,14 +514,18 @@ static void prim_derivationStrict(EvalState & state, Value * * args, Value & v)
% drvName % drvPath);
/* Optimisation, but required in read-only mode! because in that
case we don't actually write store expressions, so we can't
case we don't actually write store derivations, so we can't
read them later. */
state.drvHashes[drvPath] = hashDerivationModulo(state, drv);
/* !!! assumes a single output */
state.mkAttrs(v, 2);
mkString(*state.allocAttr(v, state.sOutPath), outPath, singleton<PathSet>(drvPath));
state.mkAttrs(v, 1 + drv.outputs.size());
mkString(*state.allocAttr(v, state.sDrvPath), drvPath, singleton<PathSet>("=" + drvPath));
foreach (DerivationOutputs::iterator, i, drv.outputs) {
/* The output path of an output X is ‘<X>Path’,
e.g. ‘outPath’. */
mkString(*state.allocAttr(v, state.symbols.create(i->first + "Path")),
i->second.path, singleton<PathSet>(drvPath));
}
v.attrs->sort();
}