lix/src/libutil/Makefile.am

lib_LTLIBRARIES = libutil.la

libutil_la_SOURCES = util.cc util.hh hash.cc hash.hh \
 archive.cc archive.hh aterm.cc aterm.hh

if !HAVE_OPENSSL
libutil_la_SOURCES += \
 md5.c md5.h sha1.c sha1.h sha256.c sha256.h md32_common.h
endif

AM_CXXFLAGS = -Wall -I.. ${aterm_include}
* Build dynamic libraries. 2005-07-22 14:52:45 +00:00			`lib_LTLIBRARIES = libutil.la`
* Source tree refactoring. 2003-11-18 10:47:59 +00:00
* Build dynamic libraries. 2005-07-22 14:52:45 +00:00			`libutil_la_SOURCES = util.cc util.hh hash.cc hash.hh \`
* Optional switch "--with-openssl=<PATH>" to use OpenSSL's implementations of MD5, SHA-1 and SHA-256. The main benefit is that we get assembler-optimised implementations of MD5 and SHA-1 (though not SHA-256 (at least on x86), unfortunately). OpenSSL's SHA-1 implementation on Intel is twice as fast as ours. 2006-02-13 19:52:43 +00:00			`archive.cc archive.hh aterm.cc aterm.hh`

			`if !HAVE_OPENSSL`
			`libutil_la_SOURCES += \`
* Add SHA-256. * Tests for the various hashes. 2005-01-14 12:03:04 +00:00			`md5.c md5.h sha1.c sha1.h sha256.c sha256.h md32_common.h`
* Optional switch "--with-openssl=<PATH>" to use OpenSSL's implementations of MD5, SHA-1 and SHA-256. The main benefit is that we get assembler-optimised implementations of MD5 and SHA-1 (though not SHA-256 (at least on x86), unfortunately). OpenSSL's SHA-1 implementation on Intel is twice as fast as ours. 2006-02-13 19:52:43 +00:00			`endif`
* Source tree refactoring. 2003-11-18 10:47:59 +00:00
* Pass SYSTEM through config.h, and allow spaces. 2004-04-23 15:16:08 +00:00			`AM_CXXFLAGS = -Wall -I.. ${aterm_include}`