--check/--rebuild reports false positive #643
Labels
No labels
Affects/CppNix
Affects/Nightly
Affects/Only nightly
Affects/Stable
Area/build-packaging
Area/cli
Area/evaluator
Area/fetching
Area/flakes
Area/language
Area/lix ci
Area/nix-eval-jobs
Area/profiles
Area/protocol
Area/releng
Area/remote-builds
Area/repl
Area/repl/debugger
Area/store
awaiting
author
awaiting
contributors
bug
Context
contributors
Context
drive-by
Context
maintainers
Context
RFD
crash 💥
Cross Compilation
devx
docs
Downstream Dependents
E/easy
E/hard
E/help wanted
E/reproducible
E/requires rearchitecture
Feature/S3
imported
Language/Bash
Language/C++
Language/NixLang
Language/Python
Language/Rust
Needs Langver
OS/Linux
OS/macOS
performance
regression
release-blocker
stability
Status
blocked
Status
invalid
Status
postponed
Status
wontfix
testing
testing/flakey
Topic/Large Scale Installations
ux
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
lix-project/lix#643
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Describe the bug
The flag returns a false positive on
rquicksharepackage.Steps To Reproduce
d806aff)--checkfails:nix-build -A rquickshare --check(compile time on my system is 5 minutes)cp -r /nix/store/glhxap88czn9lzh2dr7dc6197dk0yzpq-rquickshare-0.11.3 /tmp/oldrm result; nix-store --delete /nix/store/glhxap88czn9lzh2dr7dc6197dk0yzpq-rquickshare-0.11.3nix build .#rquickshare --offlineto rebuild without downloading from cachediff -r /tmp/old /nix/store/glhxap88czn9lzh2dr7dc6197dk0yzpq-rquickshare-0.11.3returns exactly nothingExpected behavior
--checkwouldn't failnix --versionoutputnix 2.25.4 does not have this problem
I discovered that
--keep-failedkeeps$out.check, so when I ran diff on it I gotI am not sure why those hashes are swapped, but this is still false positive as building manually twice is reproducable.