Meson fails to build Clang packages #583
Labels
No labels
Affects/CppNix
Affects/Nightly
Affects/Only nightly
Affects/Stable
Area/build-packaging
Area/cli
Area/evaluator
Area/fetching
Area/flakes
Area/language
Area/lix ci
Area/nix-eval-jobs
Area/profiles
Area/protocol
Area/releng
Area/remote-builds
Area/repl
Area/repl/debugger
Area/store
bug
Context
contributors
Context
drive-by
Context
maintainers
Context
RFD
crash 💥
Cross Compilation
devx
docs
Downstream Dependents
E/easy
E/hard
E/help wanted
E/reproducible
E/requires rearchitecture
imported
Language/Bash
Language/C++
Language/NixLang
Language/Python
Language/Rust
Needs Langver
OS/Linux
OS/macOS
performance
regression
release-blocker
stability
Status
blocked
Status
invalid
Status
postponed
Status
wontfix
testing
testing/flakey
Topic/Large Scale Installations
ux
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lix-project/lix#583
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Describe the bug
Meson fails to build Clang packages in a way that is not reproducible on Nix 2.18/2.24, but fails on Lix.
Log:
Steps To Reproduce
nix --version
output"aarch64-darwin"
Darwin 24.0.0, macOS 15.0.1
yes
no
nix-env (Lix, like Nix) 2.91.1
Worth noting that this is not exclusive to aarch64-darwin. The same issue can be reproduced on x86_64-linux
i think i need more context. currently the wording of this bug report implies it might be the bug fixed by lix-project/nixos-module#46 ?
does it reproduce when you do
nix build --rebuild nixpkgs#nixd
, which ignores overlays ?the thing that would help the most to diagnosing this is concrete reproduction steps. i don't know in which manner you mean to "add nixd to your flake": is it a nix-darwin? a dev shell? is the lix module in use? i need more information than just that it's a flake.
the easiest way to do this is to provide the sources of a simple flake which is broken.
I should have definitely been more specific.
List of things as requested:
2.91.1-1
was used, and upgrading to2.91.1-2
with the backported has fixed the issuenix build --rebuild nixpkgs#nixd
builds even without upgrading, leading me to believe it was alix-module
issueformatters.nix
snippet that adds the package, so no nix-darwin or hm:heck yeah, should be fixed then.