Download files only roughly in substitution order #19
Labels
No labels
Affects/CppNix
Affects/Nightly
Affects/Only nightly
Affects/Stable
Area/build-packaging
Area/cli
Area/evaluator
Area/fetching
Area/flakes
Area/language
Area/lix ci
Area/nix-eval-jobs
Area/profiles
Area/protocol
Area/releng
Area/remote-builds
Area/repl
Area/repl/debugger
Area/store
bug
Context
contributors
Context
drive-by
Context
maintainers
Context
RFD
crash 💥
Cross Compilation
devx
docs
Downstream Dependents
E/easy
E/hard
E/help wanted
E/reproducible
E/requires rearchitecture
imported
Language/Bash
Language/C++
Language/NixLang
Language/Python
Language/Rust
Needs Langver
OS/Linux
OS/macOS
performance
regression
release-blocker
stability
Status
blocked
Status
invalid
Status
postponed
Status
wontfix
testing
testing/flakey
Topic/Large Scale Installations
ux
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lix-project/lix#19
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Currently Nix blocks downloading the next file to substitute on its dependencies being substituted. This is very silly. We should just download in correct order and then send it to the store as dependencies are available.
Might require some serious violence to our scheduling system though.... who even does the substitution? the store ... oh no.
related
NixOS/nix#5118
NixOS/nix#4533
i think part of the reason this might be cursed is I'm not sure if you can actually feed something signed into the store without being the store yourself. and i bet you the store scheduler around substitution is just the build scheduler and. sigh.
probably the way to go about this is to have a substitution only scheduler that substitutable builds just submit all their deps to, then await the result. we'd have to ensure it's in a preorder traversal (i think)
another bug NixOS/nix#8758
related #139