Lock paths can become too long when remote builders are involved #157
Labels
No labels
Affects/CppNix
Affects/Nightly
Affects/Only nightly
Affects/Stable
Area/build-packaging
Area/cli
Area/evaluator
Area/fetching
Area/flakes
Area/language
Area/lix ci
Area/nix-eval-jobs
Area/profiles
Area/protocol
Area/releng
Area/remote-builds
Area/repl
Area/repl/debugger
Area/store
bug
Context
contributors
Context
drive-by
Context
maintainers
Context
RFD
crash 💥
Cross Compilation
devx
docs
Downstream Dependents
E/easy
E/hard
E/help wanted
E/reproducible
E/requires rearchitecture
imported
Language/Bash
Language/C++
Language/NixLang
Language/Python
Language/Rust
Needs Langver
OS/Linux
OS/macOS
performance
regression
release-blocker
stability
Status
blocked
Status
invalid
Status
postponed
Status
wontfix
testing
testing/flakey
Topic/Large Scale Installations
ux
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lix-project/lix#157
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Running
installChecks
on https://gerrit.lix.systems/plugins/gitiles/lix/+/dea029ff5141870bed84d4b578f3683280654d7d causes an error due to using the ridiculously long lockfile path of:This should likely be replaced by a hash instead so that the name cannot become absurdly long.
Why does the entire remote builder configuration get encoded into a lockfile path in the first place??
See https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/src/branch/main/src/build-remote/build-remote.cc#L40 and https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/src/branch/main/src/build-remote/build-remote.cc#L266
O_o
simply sha256 the normalized url and take some prefix or so
From Nixpkgs' definition of the Nix package:
Wonder if this is relevant.
honestly we should just fix this in a generalized manner by hashing the path though (maybe minus one component? maybe print out the full name so you can find which process was doing it? just to not regress the ability to find who is holding a lock)