Commit graph

1435 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eelco Dolstra dfc3a9afc3
Merge pull request #7043 from edolstra/installer-test
Add an installer test
2022-09-26 17:34:23 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 71e364c9c7
Quote URLs 2022-09-26 16:57:06 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra eceaf1997c
Remove FIXME 2022-09-26 16:54:31 +02:00
John Ericson a2a8cb10ac Dodge "trusted" vs "trustworthy" by being explicit
Hopefully this is best!
2022-09-22 14:37:52 -04:00
John Ericson 752f967c0f "valid signature" -> "trustworthy signature"
I just had a colleague get confused by the previous phrase for good
reason. "valid" sounds like an *objective* criterion, e.g. and *invalid
signature* would be one that would be trusted by no one, e.g. because it
misformatted or something.

What is actually going is that there might be a signature which is
perfectly valid to *someone else*, but not to the user, because they
don't trust the corresponding public key. This is a *subjective*
criterion, because it depends on the arbitrary and personal choice of
which public keys to trust.

I therefore think "trustworthy" is a better adjective to use. Whether
something is worthy of trust is clearly subjective, and then "trust"
within that word nicely evokes `trusted-public-keys` and friends.
2022-09-22 10:49:31 -04:00
Eelco Dolstra 0d4bf9c4d8
Fix evaluation 2022-09-15 15:56:46 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 3dd313a7c2
Add RHEL 9 2022-09-15 15:50:52 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra ba04b5b1d7
Disable Ubuntu 14.04 2022-09-15 14:51:44 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra a96ad2ab25
Add RHEL 7/8 2022-09-15 14:51:10 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 503f31e2a0
Use libvirt image 2022-09-15 13:28:03 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra ef714aa8a5
Remove pre-release Ubuntu 22.10 2022-09-15 13:25:26 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 5c8cdb9b60
Add Ubuntu 22.04 LTS 2022-09-15 13:24:17 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 29aaec1e59
Make cross product of images and tests 2022-09-15 13:15:26 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra fe958a682d
Test building 2022-09-15 11:42:10 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra cc6e312315
Get Ubuntu 22.10 to work 2022-09-14 19:44:41 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 906c947ee8
Enable daemon installation test on Fedora 2022-09-14 18:55:45 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 0a8e666dd6
Add Fedora 36 2022-09-14 18:40:16 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra fae3b4fe8a
Add an installer test
This runs the installer in a QEMU VM. Unlike the old installer test
that ran inside a declaratively built RedHat/Debian image, this uses
an image from Vagrant.
2022-09-14 15:41:11 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra a8b3d777fb Revert "Merge pull request #6621 from Kha/nested-follows"
This reverts commit c530cda345, reversing
changes made to 4adcdff5c1.
2022-09-01 15:26:19 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich 6f65c11780 Fix overlapping flake follows 2022-08-28 11:50:25 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich 2b9d381301 Fix nested flake input overrides 2022-08-28 11:47:25 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 81e42e0d3f Fix onError 2022-08-17 11:36:58 +02:00
Félix Baylac-Jacqué b47b6a418d
tests/check.sh: add nix3-build check test 2022-08-03 12:17:13 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt fbd0a6c6e2
Merge pull request #6784 from tweag/completion-test
Add some tests for the CLI completion
2022-07-18 20:32:14 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 2532fee157 On test failures, print a bash stack trace
This makes it easier to identify what command failed. It looks like:

  follow-paths.sh: test failed at:
    main in follow-paths.sh:54
2022-07-14 15:07:19 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra b15c4fdbde Split off 'nix flake check' tests 2022-07-13 21:01:16 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 752158a8ef Move flake-searching.sh and make it less dependent on git 2022-07-13 20:55:17 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 6ba45f81a8 Move flake-local-settings.sh 2022-07-13 20:51:28 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 7abcafcfea Move the 'nix bundle' tests
Note: these were previously not actually called.
2022-07-13 20:49:07 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra d16f1070f4 Split off following paths tests 2022-07-13 20:46:22 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra a094259d35 Split off 'nix flake init' tests 2022-07-13 20:37:40 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra f011c269c9 Split off the circular flake import tests 2022-07-13 20:37:32 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra c591efafd3 Split off the Mercurial flake tests 2022-07-13 15:06:57 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 420957e149 Move flakes tests to a subdirectory 2022-07-13 15:06:54 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra e1153069bd
Merge pull request #6797 from edolstra/overrides-check
Simplify the check for overrides on non-existent inputs
2022-07-13 14:45:07 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 19190c2346 tests/flakes.sh: Make sure flake7 is clean
Cherry-picked from the lazy-trees branch, where we no longer write a
lock file if any of the inputs is dirty.
2022-07-13 13:46:33 +02:00
Eelco Dolstra 12df8885cc Simplify the check for overrides on non-existent inputs 2022-07-13 13:40:40 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt b052e7e71d Add some more completion tests
- Test another command than `build`
- Test with two input flakes
2022-07-13 10:31:17 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt d34a333e2e Fix the “out of order” completion test
`--override-input` id snarky because it takes two arguments, so it
doesn't play well when completed in the middle of the CLI (since the
argument just after gets interpreted as its second argument). So use
`--update-input` instead
2022-07-13 10:25:28 +02:00
Maximilian Bosch 411111a3bc
Turn error for non-existant follows into a warning 2022-07-12 11:22:35 +02:00
Maximilian Bosch c1c37f3200
flakes: throw an error if follows-declaration for an input is invalid
I recently got fairly confused why the following expression didn't have
any effect

    {
      description = "Foobar";
      inputs.sops-nix = {
        url = github:mic92/sops-nix;
        inputs.nixpkgs_22_05.follows = "nixpkgs";
      };
    }

until I found out that the input was called `nixpkgs-22_05` (please note
the dash vs. underscore).

IMHO it's not a good idea to not throw an error in that case and
probably leave end-users rather confused, so I implemented a small check
for that which basically checks whether `follows`-declaration from
overrides actually have corresponding inputs in the transitive flake.

In fact this was done by accident already in our own test-suite where
the removal of a `follows` was apparently forgotten[1].

Since the key of the `std::map` that holds the `overrides` is a vector
and we have to find the last element of each vector (i.e. the override)
this has to be done with a for loop in O(n) complexity with `n` being
the total amount of overrides (which shouldn't be that large though).

Please note that this doesn't work with nested expressions, i.e.

    inputs.fenix.inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "...";

which is a known problem[2].

For the expression demonstrated above, an error like this will be
thrown:

    error: sops-nix has a `follows'-declaration for a non-existant input nixpkgs_22_05!

[1] 2664a216e5
[2] https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/5790
2022-07-12 10:18:38 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt 21c443d4fd Test the tilde expansion for the flake completion
Also add a disabled test for when the `--override-input` flag comes
*before* the flake ref
2022-07-12 09:48:25 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt 07e14d3ef0 Harden the comparisons in the completion test
- Don't use `printf` for the expected result, but just use bash's `$' '`
  litteral strings
- Quote the `nix` call result
- Invert the order in the comparisons (just because it feels more
  natural)
2022-07-12 09:24:31 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt 260fb837de Fix the name of the completions test 2022-07-12 09:24:31 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt 32effccb51 Add some tests for the CLI completion 2022-07-12 09:24:31 +02:00
Gytis Ivaskevicius ba1fe85b65 Add builtins.traceVerbose
Co-Authored-By: Silvan Mosberger <contact@infinisil.com>

Add builtins.traceVerbose tests
2022-07-05 19:44:26 +03:00
Théophane Hufschmitt d63cd77549
Merge pull request #6664 from Ma27/innixshell-backwards-compat
nix-shell: restore backwards-compat with old nixpkgs
2022-07-05 15:57:20 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt b7eb4ac169
Merge pull request #6699 from tennox/better-flake-new-error-message
flakes: apply templates partially on conflicts
2022-06-29 18:21:07 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt 4c8210095e
Merge pull request #6233 from flox/nix-repl-flakes
Nix repl flakes
2022-06-29 17:59:22 +02:00
Théophane Hufschmitt 83f96e61a4 Add some test for nix flake init with conflicts 2022-06-29 17:08:03 +02:00