Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
eldritch horrors b0d7a81613 fix tooling after include reorganization
clangd broke because it can't look through symlinks. compile_commands
manipulation does not fix it, clangd configuration does not fix it, a
vfs overlay does not fix it, and while a combination of those can fix
it with a bind mount in place that's just too cursed to even consider

clangd bug: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/116877

Change-Id: I8e3e8489548eb3a7aa65ac9d12a5ec8abf814aec
2024-11-19 22:55:32 +00:00
alois31 741d3b441c
libstore: add LocalDerivationGoal setupSyscallFilter hook
The seccomp setup code was a huge chunk of conditionally compiled
platform-specific code. For this reason, it is appropriate to move it to the
platform-specific implementation file. Ideally its setup could be moved a bit
to make it happen at the same place as the Darwin restrictions, but that change
is going to be less mechanical.

Change-Id: I496aa3c4fabf34656aba1e32b0089044ab5b99f8
2024-08-06 18:27:09 +02:00
alois31 127ee1a101
libstore/build: use an allowlist approach to syscall filtering
Previously, system call filtering (to prevent builders from storing files with
setuid/setgid permission bits or extended attributes) was performed using a
blocklist. While this looks simple at first, it actually carries significant
security and maintainability risks: after all, the kernel may add new syscalls
to achieve the same functionality one is trying to block, and it can even be
hard to actually add the syscall to the blocklist when building against a C
library that doesn't know about it yet. For a recent demonstration of this
happening in practice to Nix, see the introduction of fchmodat2 [0] [1].

The allowlist approach does not share the same drawback. While it does require
a rather large list of harmless syscalls to be maintained in the codebase,
failing to update this list (and roll out the update to all users) in time has
rather benign effects; at worst, very recent programs that already rely on new
syscalls will fail with an error the same way they would on a slightly older
kernel that doesn't support them yet. Most importantly, no unintended new ways
of performing dangerous operations will be silently allowed.

Another possible drawback is reduced system call performance due to the larger
filter created by the allowlist requiring more computation [2]. However, this
issue has not convincingly been demonstrated yet in practice, for example in
systemd or various browsers. To the contrary, it has been measured that the the
actual filter constructed here has approximately the same overhead as a very
simple filter blocking only one system call.

This commit tries to keep the behavior as close to unchanged as possible. The
system call list is in line with libseccomp 2.5.5 and glibc 2.39, which are the
latest versions at the point of writing. Since libseccomp 2.5.5 is already a
requirement and the distributions shipping this together with older versions of
glibc are mostly not a thing any more, this should not lead to more build
failures any more.

[0] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/300635
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/10424
[2] https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/4462#issuecomment-1061690607

Change-Id: I541be3ea9b249bcceddfed6a5a13ac10b11e16ad
2024-07-25 18:24:40 +02:00