lix-project/lix
20
57
Fork 31
Code Issues 349 Code Review (Gerrit) Projects 3 Releases Wiki Activity

* Some preliminaries towards NIX-45.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Eelco Dolstra 2006-05-02 13:39:55 +00:00
parent ae55e79541
commit dc719e6ba5
3 changed files with 35 additions and 10 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
src/libexpr/eval.cc
View file

@ -29,6 +29,19 @@ static Expr substArgs(Expr body, ATermList formals, Expr arg)
ATermMap subs(ATgetLength(formals) * 2);
Expr undefined = makeUndefined();
/* ({x ? E1; y ? E2, z}: E3) {x = E4; z = E5;}
=> let {x = E4; y = E2; z = E5; body = E3; }
=> subst(E3, s)
s = {
R = rec {x = E4; y = E2; z = E5}
x -> R.x
y -> R.y
z -> R.z
}
*/
/* Get the formal arguments. */
for (ATermIterator i(formals); i; ++i) {
Expr name, def;
@ -278,7 +291,7 @@ Expr evalExpr2(EvalState & state, Expr e)
if (matchVar(e, name)) {
ATerm primOp = state.primOps.get(name);
if (!primOp)
throw Error(format("impossible: undefined variable `%1%'") % name);
throw Error(format("impossible: undefined variable `%1%'") % aterm2String(name));
int arity;
ATermBlob fun;
if (!matchPrimOpDef(primOp, arity, fun)) abort();
@ -509,9 +522,16 @@ Expr evalFile(EvalState & state, const Path & path)
}
/* Yes, this is a really bad idea... */
extern "C" {
unsigned long AT_calcAllocatedSize();
}
void printEvalStats(EvalState & state)
{
debug(format("evaluated %1% expressions, %2% cache hits, %3%%% efficiency")
printMsg(lvlInfo,
format("evaluated %1% expressions, %2% cache hits, %3%%% efficiency, used %4% ATerm bytes")
% state.nrEvaluated % state.nrCached
% ((float) state.nrCached / (float) state.nrEvaluated * 100));
% ((float) state.nrCached / (float) state.nrEvaluated * 100)
% AT_calcAllocatedSize());
}

2
src/libexpr/get-drvs.cc
View file

@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void getDerivations(EvalState & state, Expr e,
format("evaluating attribute `%1%'") % aterm2String(*i));
if (getDerivation(state, drvMap.get(*i), drvs, doneExprs)) {
/* If the value of this attribute is itself an
attribute self, should we recurse into it?
attribute set, should we recurse into it?
=> Only if it has a `recurseForDerivations = true'
attribute. */
ATermList es;

17
src/libexpr/nixexpr.cc
View file

@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ Expr substitute(const ATermMap & subs, Expr e)
{
checkInterrupt();
//if (subs.size() == 0) return e;
ATerm name, pos, e2;
/* As an optimisation, don't substitute in subterms known to be
@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ Expr substitute(const ATermMap & subs, Expr e)
subs2.remove(name);
}
return makeFunction(
(ATermList) substitute(subs, (ATerm) formals),
(ATermList) substitute(subs2, (ATerm) formals),
substitute(subs2, body), pos);
}
@ -327,13 +329,16 @@ static void checkVarDefs2(set<Expr> & done, const ATermMap & defs, Expr e)
ATermMap defs2(defs);
for (ATermIterator i(formals); i; ++i) {
Expr deflt;
if (!matchNoDefFormal(*i, name))
if (matchDefFormal(*i, name, deflt))
checkVarDefs2(done, defs, deflt);
else
abort();
if (!matchNoDefFormal(*i, name) &&
!matchDefFormal(*i, name, deflt))
abort();
defs2.set(name, (ATerm) ATempty);
}
for (ATermIterator i(formals); i; ++i) {
Expr deflt;
if (matchDefFormal(*i, name, deflt))
checkVarDefs2(done, defs2, deflt);
}
checkVarDefs2(done, defs2, body);
}