Use more robust test for libatomics
Taken from Mesa configure script: https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/blob/17.2/configure.ac#L405-L427
This commit is contained in:
parent
74b4737d8f
commit
b1c34152fe
17
configure.ac
17
configure.ac
|
@ -157,11 +157,18 @@ AX_BOOST_BASE([1.66], [CXXFLAGS="$BOOST_CPPFLAGS $CXXFLAGS"], [AC_MSG_ERROR([Nix
|
||||||
# ends up with LDFLAGS being empty, so we set it afterwards.
|
# ends up with LDFLAGS being empty, so we set it afterwards.
|
||||||
LDFLAGS="$BOOST_LDFLAGS $LDFLAGS"
|
LDFLAGS="$BOOST_LDFLAGS $LDFLAGS"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Boost atomic needs GCC libatomic on 32-bit ARM
|
# On some platforms, new-style atomics need a helper library
|
||||||
case "$host_cpu" in
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether -latomic is needed)
|
||||||
armv5*|armv6*|armv7*) LIBS="-latomic $LIBS"
|
AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
|
||||||
esac
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
||||||
|
uint64_t v;
|
||||||
|
int main() {
|
||||||
|
return (int)__atomic_load_n(&v, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
|
||||||
|
}]])], GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_NEED_LIBATOMIC=no, GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_NEED_LIBATOMIC=yes)
|
||||||
|
AC_MSG_RESULT($GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_NEED_LIBATOMIC)
|
||||||
|
if test "x$GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_NEED_LIBATOMIC" = xyes; then
|
||||||
|
LIBS="-latomic $LIBS"
|
||||||
|
fi
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Look for OpenSSL, a required dependency.
|
# Look for OpenSSL, a required dependency.
|
||||||
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([OPENSSL], [libcrypto], [CXXFLAGS="$OPENSSL_CFLAGS $CXXFLAGS"])
|
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([OPENSSL], [libcrypto], [CXXFLAGS="$OPENSSL_CFLAGS $CXXFLAGS"])
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue