Be more lenient when realisations have a conflicting dependency set
- This can legitimately happen (for example because of a non-determinism causing a build-time dependency to be kept or not as a runtime reference) - Because of older Nix versions, it can happen that we encounter a realisation with an (erroneously) empty set of dependencies, in which case we don’t want to fail, but just warn the user and try to fix it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
db4d4cf4ba
commit
a4ec6cb1da
|
@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ LocalStore::LocalStore(const Params & params)
|
|||
if (settings.isExperimentalFeatureEnabled("ca-derivations")) {
|
||||
state->stmts->RegisterRealisedOutput.create(state->db,
|
||||
R"(
|
||||
insert or replace into Realisations (drvPath, outputName, outputPath, signatures)
|
||||
insert into Realisations (drvPath, outputName, outputPath, signatures)
|
||||
values (?, ?, (select id from ValidPaths where path = ?), ?)
|
||||
;
|
||||
)");
|
||||
|
@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ LocalStore::LocalStore(const Params & params)
|
|||
R"(
|
||||
insert or replace into RealisationsRefs (referrer, realisationReference)
|
||||
values (
|
||||
?,
|
||||
(select id from Realisations where drvPath = ? and outputName = ?),
|
||||
(select id from Realisations where drvPath = ? and outputName = ?));
|
||||
)");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -748,7 +748,6 @@ void LocalStore::registerDrvOutput(const Realisation & info)
|
|||
(concatStringsSep(" ", info.signatures))
|
||||
.exec();
|
||||
}
|
||||
uint64_t myId = state->db.getLastInsertedRowId();
|
||||
for (auto & [outputId, depPath] : info.dependentRealisations) {
|
||||
auto localRealisation = queryRealisationCore_(*state, outputId);
|
||||
if (!localRealisation)
|
||||
|
@ -761,7 +760,8 @@ void LocalStore::registerDrvOutput(const Realisation & info)
|
|||
"match what we have locally",
|
||||
info.id.to_string(), outputId.to_string());
|
||||
state->stmts->AddRealisationReference.use()
|
||||
(myId)
|
||||
(info.id.strHash())
|
||||
(info.id.outputName)
|
||||
(outputId.strHash())
|
||||
(outputId.outputName)
|
||||
.exec();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -144,8 +144,16 @@ bool Realisation::isCompatibleWith(const Realisation & other) const
|
|||
{
|
||||
assert (id == other.id);
|
||||
if (outPath == other.outPath) {
|
||||
assert(dependentRealisations == other.dependentRealisations);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
if (dependentRealisations.empty() != other.dependentRealisations.empty()) {
|
||||
warn(
|
||||
"Encountered a realisation for '%s' with an empty set of "
|
||||
"dependencies. This is likely an artifact from an older Nix. "
|
||||
"I’ll try to fix the realisation if I can",
|
||||
id.to_string());
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} else if (dependentRealisations == other.dependentRealisations) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue