Add allow-new-privileges option
This allows builds to call setuid binaries. This was previously possible until we started using seccomp. Turns out that seccomp by default disallows processes from acquiring new privileges. Generally, any use of setuid binaries (except those created by the builder itself) is by definition impure, but some people were relying on this ability for certain tests. Example: $ nix build '(with import <nixpkgs> {}; runCommand "foo" {} "/run/wrappers/bin/ping -c 1 8.8.8.8; exit 1")' --no-allow-new-privileges builder for ‘/nix/store/j0nd8kv85hd6r4kxgnwzvr0k65ykf6fv-foo.drv’ failed with exit code 1; last 2 log lines: cannot raise the capability into the Ambient set : Operation not permitted $ nix build '(with import <nixpkgs> {}; runCommand "foo" {} "/run/wrappers/bin/ping -c 1 8.8.8.8; exit 1")' --allow-new-privileges builder for ‘/nix/store/j0nd8kv85hd6r4kxgnwzvr0k65ykf6fv-foo.drv’ failed with exit code 1; last 6 log lines: PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=15.2 ms Fixes #1429.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ad8b96f1f2
commit
6cf23c3e8f
|
@ -643,6 +643,23 @@ password <replaceable>my-password</replaceable>
|
||||||
</varlistentry>
|
</varlistentry>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<varlistentry xml:id="conf-allow-new-privileges"><term><literal>allow-new-privileges</literal></term>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<listitem><para>(Linux-specific.) By default, builders on Linux
|
||||||
|
cannot acquire new privileges by calling setuid/setgid programs or
|
||||||
|
programs that have file capabilities. For example, programs such
|
||||||
|
as <command>sudo</command> or <command>ping</command> will
|
||||||
|
fail. (Note that in sandbox builds, no such programs are available
|
||||||
|
unless you bind-mount them into the sandbox via the
|
||||||
|
<option>build-sandbox-paths</option> option.) You can allow the
|
||||||
|
use of such programs by enabling this option. This is impure and
|
||||||
|
usually undesirable, but may be useful in certain scenarios
|
||||||
|
(e.g. to spin up containers or set up userspace network interfaces
|
||||||
|
in tests).</para></listitem>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
</varlistentry>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
</variablelist>
|
</variablelist>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
</para>
|
</para>
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -2340,6 +2340,9 @@ void setupSeccomp()
|
||||||
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ERRNO(ENOTSUP), SCMP_SYS(fsetxattr), 0) != 0)
|
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ERRNO(ENOTSUP), SCMP_SYS(fsetxattr), 0) != 0)
|
||||||
throw SysError("unable to add seccomp rule");
|
throw SysError("unable to add seccomp rule");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (seccomp_attr_set(ctx, SCMP_FLTATR_CTL_NNP, settings.allowNewPrivileges ? 0 : 1) != 0)
|
||||||
|
throw SysError("unable to set 'no new privileges' seccomp attribute");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (seccomp_load(ctx) != 0)
|
if (seccomp_load(ctx) != 0)
|
||||||
throw SysError("unable to load seccomp BPF program");
|
throw SysError("unable to load seccomp BPF program");
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -321,6 +321,12 @@ public:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Setting<std::string> userAgentSuffix{this, "", "user-agent-suffix",
|
Setting<std::string> userAgentSuffix{this, "", "user-agent-suffix",
|
||||||
"String appended to the user agent in HTTP requests."};
|
"String appended to the user agent in HTTP requests."};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#if __linux__
|
||||||
|
Setting<bool> allowNewPrivileges{this, false, "allow-new-privileges",
|
||||||
|
"Whether builders can acquire new privileges by calling programs with "
|
||||||
|
"setuid/setgid bits or with file capabilities."};
|
||||||
|
#endif
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue