review process: all PRs must be triaged

in order to make the development process more transparent for everyone,
all pull requests should go through the triage process before getting
merged.

this ensures that all team members are aware of what is going on, and
that rationale for decisions is kept track of in the meeting notes for
posterity. (ideally all that should go into the commit history, but this
is a more invasive process change that needs further deliberation.)

having all team members take at least a brief but conscious look at each
change may also help with keeping our quality standards, as more
reviewers are more likely to remind each other of our shared values.
This commit is contained in:
Valentin Gagarin 2023-01-11 09:39:24 +01:00
parent 56dc6ed841
commit 6c651599b0

View file

@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Meeting notes are collected on a [collaborative scratchpad](https://pad.lassul.u
The team uses a [GitHub project board](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/19/views/1) for tracking its work.
Issues on the board progress through the following states:
Items on the board progress through the following states:
- No Status
@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ Issues on the board progress through the following states:
If there is disagreement on the general idea behind an issue or pull request, it is moved to _To discuss_, otherwise to _In review_.
To ensure process quality and reliability, all pull requests must be triaged before merging.
- To discuss
Pull requests and issues that are deemed important and controversial are discussed by the team during discussion meetings.