* Refactoring.
This commit is contained in:
Eelco Dolstra
parent
d7b2d11255
commit
58969fa2bf
|
|
@ -687,17 +687,6 @@ private:
|
|||
/* Synchronously wait for a build hook to finish. */
|
||||
void terminateBuildHook(bool kill = false);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Acquires locks on the output paths and gathers information
|
||||
about the build (e.g., the input closures). During this
|
||||
process its possible that we find out that the build is
|
||||
unnecessary, in which case we return prDone. It's also
|
||||
possible that some other goal is already building/substituting
|
||||
the output paths, in which case we return prRestart (go back to
|
||||
the haveDerivation() state). Otherwise, prProceed is
|
||||
returned. */
|
||||
typedef enum {prProceed, prDone, prRestart} PrepareBuildReply;
|
||||
PrepareBuildReply prepareBuild();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start building a derivation. */
|
||||
void startBuilder();
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -834,19 +823,6 @@ void DerivationGoal::haveDerivation()
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If this is a fixed-output derivation, it is possible that some
|
||||
other goal is already building the output paths. (The case
|
||||
where some other process is building it is handled through
|
||||
normal locking mechanisms.) So if any output paths are already
|
||||
being built, put this goal to sleep. */
|
||||
foreach (PathSet::iterator, i, invalidOutputs)
|
||||
if (pathIsLockedByMe(*i)) {
|
||||
/* Wait until any goal finishes (hopefully the one that is
|
||||
locking *i), then retry haveDerivation(). */
|
||||
worker.waitForAnyGoal(shared_from_this());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We are first going to try to create the invalid output paths
|
||||
through substitutes. If that doesn't work, we'll build
|
||||
them. */
|
||||
|
|
@ -948,52 +924,101 @@ void DerivationGoal::inputsRealised()
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
PathSet outputPaths(const DerivationOutputs & outputs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PathSet paths;
|
||||
for (DerivationOutputs::const_iterator i = outputs.begin();
|
||||
i != outputs.end(); ++i)
|
||||
paths.insert(i->second.path);
|
||||
return paths;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void DerivationGoal::tryToBuild()
|
||||
{
|
||||
trace("trying to build");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Acquire locks on the output paths. After acquiring the locks,
|
||||
it might turn out that somebody else has performed the build
|
||||
already, and we're done. If not, we can proceed. */
|
||||
switch (prepareBuild()) {
|
||||
case prDone:
|
||||
amDone(ecSuccess);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case prRestart:
|
||||
/* Check for the possibility that some other goal in this process
|
||||
has locked the output since we checked in haveDerivation().
|
||||
(It can't happen between here and the lockPaths() call below
|
||||
because we're not allowing multi-threading.) If so, put this
|
||||
goal to sleep until another goal finishes, then try again. */
|
||||
foreach (DerivationOutputs::iterator, i, drv.outputs)
|
||||
if (pathIsLockedByMe(i->second.path)) {
|
||||
debug(format("putting derivation `%1%' to sleep because `%2%' is locked by another goal")
|
||||
% drvPath % i->second.path);
|
||||
worker.waitForAnyGoal(shared_from_this());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case prProceed:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is the build hook willing to accept this job? */
|
||||
usingBuildHook = true;
|
||||
switch (tryBuildHook()) {
|
||||
case rpAccept:
|
||||
/* Yes, it has started doing so. Wait until we get
|
||||
EOF from the hook. */
|
||||
state = &DerivationGoal::buildDone;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case rpPostpone:
|
||||
/* Not now; wait until at least one child finishes. */
|
||||
worker.waitForChildTermination(shared_from_this());
|
||||
outputLocks.unlock();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case rpDecline:
|
||||
/* We should do it ourselves. */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Obtain locks on all output paths. The locks are automatically
|
||||
released when we exit this function or Nix crashes. */
|
||||
/* !!! nonblock */
|
||||
outputLocks.lockPaths(outputPaths(drv.outputs),
|
||||
(format("waiting for lock on %1%") % showPaths(outputPaths(drv.outputs))).str());
|
||||
|
||||
usingBuildHook = false;
|
||||
/* Now check again whether the outputs are valid. This is because
|
||||
another process may have started building in parallel. After
|
||||
it has finished and released the locks, we can (and should)
|
||||
reuse its results. (Strictly speaking the first check can be
|
||||
omitted, but that would be less efficient.) Note that since we
|
||||
now hold the locks on the output paths, no other process can
|
||||
build this derivation, so no further checks are necessary. */
|
||||
PathSet validPaths = checkPathValidity(true);
|
||||
if (validPaths.size() == drv.outputs.size()) {
|
||||
debug(format("skipping build of derivation `%1%', someone beat us to it")
|
||||
% drvPath);
|
||||
outputLocks.setDeletion(true);
|
||||
amDone(ecSuccess);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure that we are allowed to start a build. */
|
||||
if (!worker.canBuildMore()) {
|
||||
worker.waitForBuildSlot(shared_from_this());
|
||||
if (validPaths.size() > 0)
|
||||
/* !!! fix this; try to delete valid paths */
|
||||
throw Error(
|
||||
format("derivation `%1%' is blocked by its output paths")
|
||||
% drvPath);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If any of the outputs already exist but are not valid, delete
|
||||
them. */
|
||||
foreach (DerivationOutputs::iterator, i, drv.outputs) {
|
||||
Path path = i->second.path;
|
||||
if (worker.store.isValidPath(path))
|
||||
throw Error(format("obstructed build: path `%1%' exists") % path);
|
||||
if (pathExists(path)) {
|
||||
debug(format("removing unregistered path `%1%'") % path);
|
||||
deletePathWrapped(path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is the build hook willing to accept this job? */
|
||||
usingBuildHook = true;
|
||||
switch (tryBuildHook()) {
|
||||
case rpAccept:
|
||||
/* Yes, it has started doing so. Wait until we get EOF
|
||||
from the hook. */
|
||||
state = &DerivationGoal::buildDone;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case rpPostpone:
|
||||
/* Not now; wait until at least one child finishes. */
|
||||
worker.waitForChildTermination(shared_from_this());
|
||||
outputLocks.unlock();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case rpDecline:
|
||||
/* We should do it ourselves. */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
usingBuildHook = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure that we are allowed to start a build. */
|
||||
if (!worker.canBuildMore()) {
|
||||
worker.waitForBuildSlot(shared_from_this());
|
||||
outputLocks.unlock();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Okay, we have to build. */
|
||||
startBuilder();
|
||||
|
|
@ -1003,12 +1028,8 @@ void DerivationGoal::tryToBuild()
|
|||
outputLocks.unlock();
|
||||
buildUser.release();
|
||||
if (printBuildTrace)
|
||||
if (usingBuildHook)
|
||||
printMsg(lvlError, format("@ hook-failed %1% %2% %3% %4%")
|
||||
% drvPath % drv.outputs["out"].path % 0 % e.msg());
|
||||
else
|
||||
printMsg(lvlError, format("@ build-failed %1% %2% %3% %4%")
|
||||
% drvPath % drv.outputs["out"].path % 0 % e.msg());
|
||||
printMsg(lvlError, format("@ build-failed %1% %2% %3% %4%")
|
||||
% drvPath % drv.outputs["out"].path % 0 % e.msg());
|
||||
amDone(ecFailed);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1179,16 +1200,6 @@ static void drain(int fd)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
PathSet outputPaths(const DerivationOutputs & outputs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PathSet paths;
|
||||
for (DerivationOutputs::const_iterator i = outputs.begin();
|
||||
i != outputs.end(); ++i)
|
||||
paths.insert(i->second.path);
|
||||
return paths;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DerivationGoal::HookReply DerivationGoal::tryBuildHook()
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!useBuildHook) return rpDecline;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1352,72 +1363,10 @@ void DerivationGoal::terminateBuildHook(bool kill)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DerivationGoal::PrepareBuildReply DerivationGoal::prepareBuild()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Check for the possibility that some other goal in this process
|
||||
has locked the output since we checked in haveDerivation().
|
||||
(It can't happen between here and the lockPaths() call below
|
||||
because we're not allowing multi-threading.) */
|
||||
foreach (DerivationOutputs::iterator, i, drv.outputs)
|
||||
if (pathIsLockedByMe(i->second.path)) {
|
||||
debug(format("restarting derivation `%1%' because `%2%' is locked by another goal")
|
||||
% drvPath % i->second.path);
|
||||
return prRestart;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Obtain locks on all output paths. The locks are automatically
|
||||
released when we exit this function or Nix crashes. */
|
||||
/* !!! BUG: this could block, which is not allowed. */
|
||||
/* !!! and once we make this non-blocking, we should carefully
|
||||
consider the case where some but not all locks are required; we
|
||||
should then release the acquired locks so that the other
|
||||
processes and the pathIsLockedByMe() test don't get confused. */
|
||||
outputLocks.lockPaths(outputPaths(drv.outputs),
|
||||
(format("waiting for lock on %1%") % showPaths(outputPaths(drv.outputs))).str());
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now check again whether the outputs are valid. This is because
|
||||
another process may have started building in parallel. After
|
||||
it has finished and released the locks, we can (and should)
|
||||
reuse its results. (Strictly speaking the first check can be
|
||||
omitted, but that would be less efficient.) Note that since we
|
||||
now hold the locks on the output paths, no other process can
|
||||
build this derivation, so no further checks are necessary. */
|
||||
PathSet validPaths = checkPathValidity(true);
|
||||
if (validPaths.size() == drv.outputs.size()) {
|
||||
debug(format("skipping build of derivation `%1%', someone beat us to it")
|
||||
% drvPath);
|
||||
outputLocks.setDeletion(true);
|
||||
return prDone;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (validPaths.size() > 0) {
|
||||
/* !!! fix this; try to delete valid paths */
|
||||
throw Error(
|
||||
format("derivation `%1%' is blocked by its output paths")
|
||||
% drvPath);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If any of the outputs already exist but are not registered,
|
||||
delete them. */
|
||||
foreach (DerivationOutputs::iterator, i, drv.outputs) {
|
||||
Path path = i->second.path;
|
||||
if (worker.store.isValidPath(path))
|
||||
throw Error(format("obstructed build: path `%1%' exists") % path);
|
||||
if (pathExists(path)) {
|
||||
debug(format("removing unregistered path `%1%'") % path);
|
||||
deletePathWrapped(path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return prProceed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void chmod(const Path & path, mode_t mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (::chmod(path.c_str(), 01777) == -1)
|
||||
throw SysError(format("setting permissions on `%1%'") % path);
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue