doc/cli-guideline: Apply suggestions from code review
Thanks Valentin!
This commit is contained in:
parent
f09ccd8ea9
commit
17f70b10bf
|
@ -391,45 +391,39 @@ status section, but only print warnings and errors.
|
|||
|
||||
## Returning future proof JSON
|
||||
|
||||
The machine-readable JSON output should be extensible. This means that the
|
||||
structure of the JSON should support the addition of extra information in many
|
||||
places.
|
||||
The schema of JSON output should allow for backwards compatible extension. This section explains how to achieve this.
|
||||
|
||||
Two definitions are helpful here, because while JSON only defines one "key-value"
|
||||
object, we use it to cover two use cases:
|
||||
object type, we use it to cover two use cases:
|
||||
|
||||
- **dictionary**: a map from names to things that all have the same type. In
|
||||
- **dictionary**: a map from names to value that all have the same type. In
|
||||
C++ this would be a `std::map` with string keys.
|
||||
- **record**: a fixed set of attributes each with their own type. In C++, this
|
||||
would be represented by a struct.
|
||||
would be represented by a `struct`.
|
||||
|
||||
It is best not to mix these use cases, as that leads to incompatibilities and
|
||||
other bugs. For example, adding a record field to a dictionary breaks consumers
|
||||
that assume all JSON object fields to have the same meaning and type.
|
||||
It is best not to mix these use cases, as that may lead to incompatibilities when the schema changes. For example, adding a record field to a dictionary breaks consumers that assume all JSON object fields to have the same meaning and type.
|
||||
|
||||
This leads to the following guidelines:
|
||||
|
||||
- **The top-level value** (or **root** of the returned data structure) **must be a record**.
|
||||
Without this rule, it would be impossible to add per-invocation metadata in
|
||||
a manner that doesn't break existing consumers.
|
||||
- The top-level (root) value must be a record.
|
||||
|
||||
- **The value of a dictionary item must always be a record**. As an example,
|
||||
suppose a command returns a dictionary where each key is the name of a store
|
||||
type and each value is itself a dictionary representing settings.
|
||||
Otherwise, one can not change the structure of a command's output.
|
||||
|
||||
- **List items should be records**. For example, a list of strings is not an
|
||||
extensible type, as any additions will break code that expects a list of
|
||||
strings.
|
||||
If the list is unordered and it has a unique key that is a string, consider
|
||||
a dictionary instead of a list. If the order of the items needs to be
|
||||
preserved, return a list of records.
|
||||
- The value of a dictionary item must be a record.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Streaming JSON should return records**. An example of a streaming JSON
|
||||
format is "JSON lines", where multiple JSON values are streamed by putting
|
||||
each on its own line in a text stream. These JSON values can be considered
|
||||
top-level values or list items, and they must be records.
|
||||
Otherwise, the item type can not be extended.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
- List items should be records.
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, one can not change the structure of the list items.
|
||||
|
||||
If the order of the items does not matter, and each item has a unique key that is a string, consider representing the list as a dictionary instead. If the order of the items needs to be preserved, return a list of records.
|
||||
|
||||
- Streaming JSON should return records.
|
||||
|
||||
An example of a streaming JSON format is [JSON lines](https://jsonlines.org/), where each line represents a JSON value. These JSON values can be considered top-level values or list items, and they must be records.
|
||||
|
||||
### Examples
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// bad: all keys must be assumed to be store implementations
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue