Fix the printing of the installables on nix profile install
conflict
- If the element comes from a flake, print the full flakeref (with the fragment part) and not just the reference to the flake itself - If the element doesn't come from a flake, print its store path(s) This is a bit too verbose, but has the advantages of being correct (and not crashing), so it's strictly better than the previous situation Fix https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/8284
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d144e778e
commit
e997512523
|
@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct ProfileElementSource
|
|||
std::tuple(originalRef.to_string(), attrPath, outputs) <
|
||||
std::tuple(other.originalRef.to_string(), other.attrPath, other.outputs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::string to_string() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return fmt("%s#%s%s", originalRef, attrPath, outputs.to_string());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const int defaultPriority = 5;
|
||||
|
@ -45,13 +50,27 @@ struct ProfileElement
|
|||
std::string identifier() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (source)
|
||||
return fmt("%s#%s%s", source->originalRef, source->attrPath, source->outputs.to_string());
|
||||
return source->to_string();
|
||||
StringSet names;
|
||||
for (auto & path : storePaths)
|
||||
names.insert(DrvName(path.name()).name);
|
||||
return concatStringsSep(", ", names);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Return a string representing an installable corresponding to the current
|
||||
* element, either a flakeref or a plain store path
|
||||
*/
|
||||
std::set<std::string> toInstallables(Store & store)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (source)
|
||||
return {source->to_string()};
|
||||
StringSet rawPaths;
|
||||
for (auto & path : storePaths)
|
||||
rawPaths.insert(store.printStorePath(path));
|
||||
return rawPaths;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::string versions() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
StringSet versions;
|
||||
|
@ -363,10 +382,10 @@ struct CmdProfileInstall : InstallablesCommand, MixDefaultProfile
|
|||
auto profileElement = *it;
|
||||
for (auto & storePath : profileElement.storePaths) {
|
||||
if (conflictError.fileA.starts_with(store->printStorePath(storePath))) {
|
||||
return std::pair(conflictError.fileA, profileElement.source->originalRef);
|
||||
return std::pair(conflictError.fileA, profileElement.toInstallables(*store));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (conflictError.fileB.starts_with(store->printStorePath(storePath))) {
|
||||
return std::pair(conflictError.fileB, profileElement.source->originalRef);
|
||||
return std::pair(conflictError.fileB, profileElement.toInstallables(*store));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -375,9 +394,9 @@ struct CmdProfileInstall : InstallablesCommand, MixDefaultProfile
|
|||
// There are 2 conflicting files. We need to find out which one is from the already installed package and
|
||||
// which one is the package that is the new package that is being installed.
|
||||
// The first matching package is the one that was already installed (original).
|
||||
auto [originalConflictingFilePath, originalConflictingRef] = findRefByFilePath(manifest.elements.begin(), manifest.elements.end());
|
||||
auto [originalConflictingFilePath, originalConflictingRefs] = findRefByFilePath(manifest.elements.begin(), manifest.elements.end());
|
||||
// The last matching package is the one that was going to be installed (new).
|
||||
auto [newConflictingFilePath, newConflictingRef] = findRefByFilePath(manifest.elements.rbegin(), manifest.elements.rend());
|
||||
auto [newConflictingFilePath, newConflictingRefs] = findRefByFilePath(manifest.elements.rbegin(), manifest.elements.rend());
|
||||
|
||||
throw Error(
|
||||
"An existing package already provides the following file:\n"
|
||||
|
@ -403,8 +422,8 @@ struct CmdProfileInstall : InstallablesCommand, MixDefaultProfile
|
|||
" nix profile install %4% --priority %7%\n",
|
||||
originalConflictingFilePath,
|
||||
newConflictingFilePath,
|
||||
originalConflictingRef.to_string(),
|
||||
newConflictingRef.to_string(),
|
||||
concatStringsSep(" ", originalConflictingRefs),
|
||||
concatStringsSep(" ", newConflictingRefs),
|
||||
conflictError.priority,
|
||||
conflictError.priority - 1,
|
||||
conflictError.priority + 1
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -157,17 +157,17 @@ error: An existing package already provides the following file:
|
|||
|
||||
To remove the existing package:
|
||||
|
||||
nix profile remove path:${flake1Dir}
|
||||
nix profile remove path:${flake1Dir}#packages.${system}.default
|
||||
|
||||
The new package can also be installed next to the existing one by assigning a different priority.
|
||||
The conflicting packages have a priority of 5.
|
||||
To prioritise the new package:
|
||||
|
||||
nix profile install path:${flake2Dir} --priority 4
|
||||
nix profile install path:${flake2Dir}#packages.${system}.default --priority 4
|
||||
|
||||
To prioritise the existing package:
|
||||
|
||||
nix profile install path:${flake2Dir} --priority 6
|
||||
nix profile install path:${flake2Dir}#packages.${system}.default --priority 6
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
)
|
||||
[[ $($TEST_HOME/.nix-profile/bin/hello) = "Hello World" ]]
|
||||
|
@ -177,3 +177,10 @@ nix profile install $flake2Dir --priority 0
|
|||
[[ $($TEST_HOME/.nix-profile/bin/hello) = "Hello World2" ]]
|
||||
# nix profile install $flake1Dir --priority 100
|
||||
# [[ $($TEST_HOME/.nix-profile/bin/hello) = "Hello World" ]]
|
||||
|
||||
# Ensure that conflicts are handled properly even when the installables aren't
|
||||
# flake references.
|
||||
# Regression test for https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/8284
|
||||
clearProfiles
|
||||
nix profile install $(nix build $flake1Dir --no-link --print-out-paths)
|
||||
expect 1 nix profile install --impure --expr "(builtins.getFlake ''$flake2Dir'').packages.$system.default"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue