optimiseStore(): Use a content-addressed file store in /nix/store/.links
optimiseStore() now creates persistent, content-addressed hard links in /nix/store/.links. For instance, if it encounters a file P with hash H, it will create a hard link P' = /nix/store/.link/<H> to P if P' doesn't already exist; if P' exist, then P is replaced by a hard link to P'. This is better than the previous in-memory map, because it had the tendency to unnecessarily replace hard links with a hard link to whatever happened to be the first file with a given hash it encountered. It also allows on-the-fly, incremental optimisation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed59bf7a18
commit
564fb7d9fa
|
@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
/* Optimise the disk space usage of the Nix store by hard-linking
|
||||
files with the same contents. */
|
||||
void optimiseStore(bool dryRun, OptimiseStats & stats);
|
||||
void optimiseStore(OptimiseStats & stats);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check the integrity of the Nix store. */
|
||||
void verifyStore(bool checkContents);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
|||
#include "util.hh"
|
||||
#include "local-store.hh"
|
||||
#include "immutable.hh"
|
||||
#include "globals.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
#include <sys/types.h>
|
||||
#include <sys/stat.h>
|
||||
|
@ -12,9 +13,6 @@
|
|||
namespace nix {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
typedef std::map<Hash, std::pair<Path, ino_t> > HashToPath;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static void makeWritable(const Path & path)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct stat st;
|
||||
|
@ -51,132 +49,135 @@ struct MakeImmutable
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static void hashAndLink(bool dryRun, HashToPath & hashToPath,
|
||||
OptimiseStats & stats, const Path & path)
|
||||
const string linksDir = ".links";
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static void hashAndLink(OptimiseStats & stats, const Path & path)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct stat st;
|
||||
if (lstat(path.c_str(), &st))
|
||||
throw SysError(format("getting attributes of path `%1%'") % path);
|
||||
|
||||
if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
|
||||
Strings names = readDirectory(path);
|
||||
foreach (Strings::iterator, i, names)
|
||||
hashAndLink(stats, path + "/" + *i);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We can hard link regular files and symlinks. */
|
||||
if (!S_ISREG(st.st_mode) && !S_ISLNK(st.st_mode)) return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sometimes SNAFUs can cause files in the Nix store to be
|
||||
modified, in particular when running programs as root under
|
||||
NixOS (example: $fontconfig/var/cache being modified). Skip
|
||||
those files. */
|
||||
those files. FIXME: check the modification time. */
|
||||
if (S_ISREG(st.st_mode) && (st.st_mode & S_IWUSR)) {
|
||||
printMsg(lvlError, format("skipping suspicious writable file `%1%'") % path);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We can hard link regular files and symlinks. */
|
||||
if (S_ISREG(st.st_mode) || S_ISLNK(st.st_mode)) {
|
||||
/* Hash the file. Note that hashPath() returns the hash over the
|
||||
NAR serialisation, which includes the execute bit on the file.
|
||||
Thus, executable and non-executable files with the same
|
||||
contents *won't* be linked (which is good because otherwise the
|
||||
permissions would be screwed up).
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hash the file. Note that hashPath() returns the hash over
|
||||
the NAR serialisation, which includes the execute bit on
|
||||
the file. Thus, executable and non-executable files with
|
||||
the same contents *won't* be linked (which is good because
|
||||
otherwise the permissions would be screwed up).
|
||||
Also note that if `path' is a symlink, then we're hashing the
|
||||
contents of the symlink (i.e. the result of readlink()), not
|
||||
the contents of the target (which may not even exist). */
|
||||
Hash hash = hashPath(htSHA256, path).first;
|
||||
stats.totalFiles++;
|
||||
printMsg(lvlDebug, format("`%1%' has hash `%2%'") % path % printHash(hash));
|
||||
|
||||
Also note that if `path' is a symlink, then we're hashing
|
||||
the contents of the symlink (i.e. the result of
|
||||
readlink()), not the contents of the target (which may not
|
||||
even exist). */
|
||||
Hash hash = hashPath(htSHA256, path).first;
|
||||
stats.totalFiles++;
|
||||
printMsg(lvlDebug, format("`%1%' has hash `%2%'") % path % printHash(hash));
|
||||
/* Check if this is a known hash. */
|
||||
Path linkPath = nixStore + "/" + linksDir + "/" + printHash32(hash);
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<Path, ino_t> prevPath = hashToPath[hash];
|
||||
|
||||
if (prevPath.first == "") {
|
||||
hashToPath[hash] = std::pair<Path, ino_t>(path, st.st_ino);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Yes! We've seen a file with the same contents. Replace
|
||||
the current file with a hard link to that file. */
|
||||
stats.sameContents++;
|
||||
if (prevPath.second == st.st_ino) {
|
||||
printMsg(lvlDebug, format("`%1%' is already linked to `%2%'") % path % prevPath.first);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dryRun) {
|
||||
|
||||
printMsg(lvlTalkative, format("linking `%1%' to `%2%'") % path % prevPath.first);
|
||||
if (!pathExists(linkPath)) {
|
||||
/* Nope, create a hard link in the links directory. */
|
||||
makeMutable(path);
|
||||
MakeImmutable mk1(path);
|
||||
|
||||
Path tempLink = (format("%1%.tmp-%2%-%3%")
|
||||
% path % getpid() % rand()).str();
|
||||
if (link(path.c_str(), linkPath.c_str()) == -1)
|
||||
throw SysError(format("cannot link `%1%' to `%2%'") % linkPath % path);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make the containing directory writable, but only if
|
||||
it's not the store itself (we don't want or need to
|
||||
mess with its permissions). */
|
||||
bool mustToggle = !isStorePath(path);
|
||||
if (mustToggle) makeWritable(dirOf(path));
|
||||
|
||||
/* When we're done, make the directory read-only again and
|
||||
reset its timestamp back to 0. */
|
||||
MakeReadOnly makeReadOnly(mustToggle ? dirOf(path) : "");
|
||||
|
||||
/* If ‘prevPath’ is immutable, we can't create hard links
|
||||
to it, so make it mutable first (and make it immutable
|
||||
again when we're done). We also have to make ‘path’
|
||||
mutable, otherwise rename() will fail to delete it. */
|
||||
makeMutable(prevPath.first);
|
||||
MakeImmutable mk1(prevPath.first);
|
||||
|
||||
makeMutable(path);
|
||||
MakeImmutable mk2(path);
|
||||
|
||||
if (link(prevPath.first.c_str(), tempLink.c_str()) == -1) {
|
||||
if (errno == EMLINK) {
|
||||
/* Too many links to the same file (>= 32000 on
|
||||
most file systems). This is likely to happen
|
||||
with empty files. Just start over, creating
|
||||
links to the current file. */
|
||||
printMsg(lvlInfo, format("`%1%' has maximum number of links") % prevPath.first);
|
||||
hashToPath[hash] = std::pair<Path, ino_t>(path, st.st_ino);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw SysError(format("cannot link `%1%' to `%2%'")
|
||||
% tempLink % prevPath.first);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Atomically replace the old file with the new hard link. */
|
||||
if (rename(tempLink.c_str(), path.c_str()) == -1) {
|
||||
if (errno == EMLINK) {
|
||||
/* Some filesystems generate too many links on the
|
||||
rename, rather than on the original link.
|
||||
(Probably it temporarily increases the st_nlink
|
||||
field before decreasing it again.) */
|
||||
printMsg(lvlInfo, format("`%1%' has maximum number of links") % prevPath.first);
|
||||
hashToPath[hash] = std::pair<Path, ino_t>(path, st.st_ino);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Unlink the temp link. */
|
||||
if (unlink(tempLink.c_str()) == -1)
|
||||
printMsg(lvlError, format("unable to unlink `%1%'") % tempLink);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw SysError(format("cannot rename `%1%' to `%2%'")
|
||||
% tempLink % path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
printMsg(lvlTalkative, format("would link `%1%' to `%2%'") % path % prevPath.first);
|
||||
|
||||
stats.filesLinked++;
|
||||
stats.bytesFreed += st.st_size;
|
||||
stats.blocksFreed += st.st_blocks;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
|
||||
Strings names = readDirectory(path);
|
||||
foreach (Strings::iterator, i, names)
|
||||
hashAndLink(dryRun, hashToPath, stats, path + "/" + *i);
|
||||
/* Yes! We've seen a file with the same contents. Replace the
|
||||
current file with a hard link to that file. */
|
||||
struct stat stLink;
|
||||
if (lstat(linkPath.c_str(), &stLink))
|
||||
throw SysError(format("getting attributes of path `%1%'") % linkPath);
|
||||
|
||||
stats.sameContents++;
|
||||
if (st.st_ino == stLink.st_ino) {
|
||||
printMsg(lvlDebug, format("`%1%' is already linked to `%2%'") % path % linkPath);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
printMsg(lvlTalkative, format("linking `%1%' to `%2%'") % path % linkPath);
|
||||
|
||||
Path tempLink = (format("%1%/.tmp-link-%2%-%3%")
|
||||
% nixStore % getpid() % rand()).str();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make the containing directory writable, but only if it's not
|
||||
the store itself (we don't want or need to mess with its
|
||||
permissions). */
|
||||
bool mustToggle = !isStorePath(path);
|
||||
if (mustToggle) makeWritable(dirOf(path));
|
||||
|
||||
/* When we're done, make the directory read-only again and reset
|
||||
its timestamp back to 0. */
|
||||
MakeReadOnly makeReadOnly(mustToggle ? dirOf(path) : "");
|
||||
|
||||
/* If ‘linkPath’ is immutable, we can't create hard links to it,
|
||||
so make it mutable first (and make it immutable again when
|
||||
we're done). We also have to make ‘path’ mutable, otherwise
|
||||
rename() will fail to delete it. */
|
||||
makeMutable(linkPath);
|
||||
MakeImmutable mk1(linkPath);
|
||||
|
||||
makeMutable(path);
|
||||
MakeImmutable mk2(path);
|
||||
|
||||
if (link(linkPath.c_str(), tempLink.c_str()) == -1) {
|
||||
if (errno == EMLINK) {
|
||||
/* Too many links to the same file (>= 32000 on most file
|
||||
systems). This is likely to happen with empty files.
|
||||
Just shrug and ignore. */
|
||||
printMsg(lvlInfo, format("`%1%' has maximum number of links") % linkPath);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw SysError(format("cannot link `%1%' to `%2%'") % tempLink % linkPath);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Atomically replace the old file with the new hard link. */
|
||||
if (rename(tempLink.c_str(), path.c_str()) == -1) {
|
||||
if (errno == EMLINK) {
|
||||
/* Some filesystems generate too many links on the rename,
|
||||
rather than on the original link. (Probably it
|
||||
temporarily increases the st_nlink field before
|
||||
decreasing it again.) */
|
||||
printMsg(lvlInfo, format("`%1%' has maximum number of links") % linkPath);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Unlink the temp link. */
|
||||
if (unlink(linkPath.c_str()) == -1)
|
||||
printMsg(lvlError, format("unable to unlink `%1%'") % linkPath);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw SysError(format("cannot rename `%1%' to `%2%'") % tempLink % path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
stats.filesLinked++;
|
||||
stats.bytesFreed += st.st_size;
|
||||
stats.blocksFreed += st.st_blocks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void LocalStore::optimiseStore(bool dryRun, OptimiseStats & stats)
|
||||
void LocalStore::optimiseStore(OptimiseStats & stats)
|
||||
{
|
||||
HashToPath hashToPath;
|
||||
createDirs(nixStore + "/" + linksDir);
|
||||
|
||||
PathSet paths = queryValidPaths();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ void LocalStore::optimiseStore(bool dryRun, OptimiseStats & stats)
|
|||
addTempRoot(*i);
|
||||
if (!isValidPath(*i)) continue; /* path was GC'ed, probably */
|
||||
startNest(nest, lvlChatty, format("hashing files in `%1%'") % *i);
|
||||
hashAndLink(dryRun, hashToPath, stats, *i);
|
||||
hashAndLink(stats, *i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -746,18 +746,12 @@ static void showOptimiseStats(OptimiseStats & stats)
|
|||
files with the same contents. */
|
||||
static void opOptimise(Strings opFlags, Strings opArgs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!opArgs.empty())
|
||||
if (!opArgs.empty() || !opFlags.empty())
|
||||
throw UsageError("no arguments expected");
|
||||
|
||||
bool dryRun = false;
|
||||
|
||||
foreach (Strings::iterator, i, opFlags)
|
||||
if (*i == "--dry-run") dryRun = true;
|
||||
else throw UsageError(format("unknown flag `%1%'") % *i);
|
||||
|
||||
OptimiseStats stats;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
ensureLocalStore().optimiseStore(dryRun, stats);
|
||||
ensureLocalStore().optimiseStore(stats);
|
||||
} catch (...) {
|
||||
showOptimiseStats(stats);
|
||||
throw;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue