The last paragraph states about package installation of the "following"
jobs, but it only applies to generic channels, so let's only display it
there.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We should now get an overview and help text on how to add a particular
channel and also a bit of information about the builds that are required
for a channel to get upgraded.
Right now we only select the latest successful build in the latest
successful evaluation, so if someone wants to have more information about
which channel has failed, (s)he still has to look at the "Channels" tab
of the jobset.
We can make this more fancy at some later point if this is really
needed, because right now we're only interested in the latest build,
because it's the only thing necessary to deliver the channel contents.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It's actually lower-case _despite_ the spelling in the SQL file(s),
because the schema auto-generator from DBIx::Class doesn't take it into
account because it's working on SQLite and the latter seems to ignore
case.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We want to have contents and detauls of channel expressions as well and
we already have that in product.type == file, so why not reuse the same
for the channel expression?
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We now have a searchBuildsAndEvalsForJobset, which creates such a
mapping for us, so we don't need to duplicate code in jobs_tab and
channels_tab.
Also, we're going to use this for the overview of a particular channel
as well, so it makes sense to put it in CatalystUtils instead of
directly in Jobset.pm.
Instead of eval->jobs, it's now eval->builds, because it's really an
aggregate over the builds schema, rather than the job schema.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We now have a column for that, so no need for counting rows which was a
bit inefficient anyway, because we only would have needed the first row
in the result.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Now we can provide different channel expressions for one particular
channel build. Not sure yet how this would be useful, but I found it
more appropriate to use a type instead of a subtype of "file".
This should get us consistent with the provious commit.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This is to get a bit more consistency among channel builds but doesn't
do a radical change on the display. Ideally we may want to have a
channel overview with all the constituents and a small help showing how
the user can add the channel.
Unfortunately, this also introduces an inconsistency: We previously used
the *subtype* "channel", but now we're expecting "channel" as the type
of the product, so we need to change this for the channels overview as
well.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It's very similar to "jobs" and the code is pretty much the same, except
that we don't do filtering on it. At least it doesn't waste space for a
filter option when there are usually WAY less channel jobs than ordinary
jobs.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Currently I'm using a (not very well) downscaled version of the NixOS
logo, so we want to replace it by a proper image ASAP.
Other than that, the idea is to have something like this in
hydra-build-products:
file channel $out/channel.tar.bz2
Right now of course, it's only displayed at the corresponding builds, so
we might want to have aggregates on all channels for a project, jobset
or maybe even single jobs?
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Builds can now emit metrics that Hydra will store in its database and
render as time series via flot charts. Typical applications are to
keep track of performance indicators, coverage percentages, artifact
sizes, and so on.
For example, a coverage build can emit the coverage percentage as
follows:
echo "lineCoverage $pct %" > $out/nix-support/hydra-metrics
Graphs of all metrics for a job can be seen at
http://.../job/<project>/<jobset>/<job>#tabs-charts
Specific metrics are also visible at
http://.../job/<project>/<jobset>/<job>/metric/<metric>
The latter URL also allows getting the data in JSON format (e.g. via
"curl -H 'Accept: application/json'").
If Hydra isn't hosted on https://example.com/ but something like
https://example.com/hydra/, the URL for /api/scmdiff would have ended up
on /api/scmdiff rather than /hydra/api/scmdiff.
This is because we didn't use the URI resolver from the controller,
hence we're using it now to build up the whole URL including the query
string.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Without an index on (machine, stoptime desc), this requires a
sequential scan. And adding a whole index for this seems
overkill. (Possibly the queue runner could maintain this info more
efficiently.)
Aborted builds are now put back on the runnable queue and retried
after a certain time interval (currently 60 seconds for the first
retry, then tripled on each subsequent retry).
When visiting the tail-reload page, for a short amount of time the
"unscrolled" version is shown. To circumvent that, let's scroll down
immediately at the first possibility to fill the gap between the loading
of the document and the first AJAX request coming in.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
There are quite a lot of build outputs which have lines with a length
exceeding the width of the taillog <pre/> and thus visually produce more
lines than 50. This causes the tail "box" to change height frequently
and to get to the bottom you need to scroll down.
We now set a fixed line-height to 120% of the font size and cap the
maximum height based on that value (50 * 1.2 = 60). It's probably not
nice to override the line-height, but max-lines is currently only
available using browser-specific property names. But after all it's just
for the tail output, if people complain about the line-height, we can
still change it :-)
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We're just implicitly escaping the tail content by not using .load() but
explicitly setting the text content using .text(), so that escaping
isn't needed on our side.
This should get rid of a few formatting errors and possibly XSS if
someone manages to place JS code in the tail of a build and manages to
lurk a user to that tail output.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
