approve status sent for a failed build?

jade commented

2024-03-09 06:43:06 +00:00

Owner

https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/349/2#message-55f1801079346a88e4451cf286812c02e22371c5

raito commented

2024-03-09 12:19:01 +00:00

Owner

What happened in this example is that the "cleanup derivation paths" failed but the builds went all fine, so it's a transient failure for the "tearup" of the CI job but it's a success for the jobs overall.

We could maybe have a slightly different logging of that instead of FAILURE, like SUCCESS (with some minor troubles).

What happened in this example is that the "cleanup derivation paths" failed but the builds went all fine, so it's a transient failure for the "tearup" of the CI job but it's a success for the jobs overall. We could maybe have a slightly different logging of that instead of FAILURE, like SUCCESS (with some minor troubles).

pennae commented

2024-03-10 06:01:16 +00:00

Owner

also happens during the actual build phases: https://buildbot.lix.systems/#/builders/1/builds/529 here the drv was probably gc'd before the builders got to it, wasn't found, and success reported even though no build was attempted due to missing drvs

puck commented

2024-03-11 16:25:06 +00:00

Owner

This should be fixed by now; the Verified-On-{Architecture} labels have been replaced with singular Verified

This should be fixed by now; the Verified-On-{Architecture} labels have been replaced with singular `Verified` :neocat_floof:

puck closed this issue

2024-03-11 16:25:06 +00:00

approve status sent for a failed build? #3