jade
e715e5fd31
I don't know when this broke, it seems like it happened since the 24.05 upgrade, so xonsh 0.15. What happened is that xonsh was trying to intercept log output, which explodes if you have the logger survive past one command input. This is, however, impossible to avoid if you are trying to use logging when you import releng from inside xonsh for interactive use! The error below is because the memory handler backing the stdout/stderr of the one command that's just been run was closed after the command completed. Change-Id: |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
__init__.py | ||
__main__.py | ||
cli.py | ||
create_release.xsh | ||
docker.xsh | ||
docker_assemble.py | ||
environment.py | ||
gitutils.xsh | ||
keys.py | ||
README.md | ||
release-jobs.nix | ||
version.py |
Release engineering
This directory contains the release engineering scripts for Lix.
Release process
Prerequisites
- FIXME: validation via misc tests in nixpkgs, among other things? What other validation do we need before we can actually release?
- Have a release post ready to go as a PR on the website repo.
- No release-blocker bugs.
Process
The following process can be done either against the staging environment or the live environment.
For staging, the buckets are staging-releases
, staging-cache
, etc.
FIXME: obtainment of signing key for signing cache paths?
First, we prepare the release. python -m releng prepare
is used for this.
- Gather everything in
doc/manual/rl-next
and put it indoc/manual/src/release-notes/rl-MAJOR.md
.
Then we tag the release with python -m releng tag
:
- Git HEAD is detached.
officialRelease = true
is set inflake.nix
, this is committed, and a release is tagged.- The tag is merged back into the last branch (either
main
for new releases orrelease-MAJOR
for maintenance releases) withgit merge -s ours VERSION
creating a history link but ignoring the tree of the release tag. - Git HEAD is once again detached onto the release tag.
Then, we build the release artifacts with python -m releng build
:
- Source tarball is generated with
git archive
, then checksummed. - Manifest for
nix upgrade-nix
is produced and put ins3://releases
at/manifest.nix
and/lix/lix-VERSION
. - Release is built:
hydraJobs.binaryTarball
jobs are built, and joined into a derivation that depends on all of them and adds checksum files. This and the sources go intos3://releases/lix/lix-VERSION
.
At this point we have a release/artifacts
and release/manual
directory
which are ready to publish, and tags ready for publication. No keys are
required to do this part.
Next, we do the publication with python -m releng upload
:
-
Artifacts for this release are uploaded:
- s3://releases/manifest.nix, changing the default version of Lix for
nix upgrade-nix
. - s3://releases/lix/lix-VERSION/ gets the following contents
- Binary tarballs
- Docs:
manual/
(FIXME: should we actually do this? what about putting it on docs.lix.systems? I think doing both is correct, since the Web site should not be an archive of random old manuals) - Docs as tarball in addition to web.
- Source tarball
- Docker image (FIXME: upload to forgejo registry and github registry in the future)
- s3://docs/manual/lix/MAJOR
- s3://docs/manual/lix/stable
- s3://releases/manifest.nix, changing the default version of Lix for
-
The tag is uploaded to the remote repo.
-
Manually build the installer using the scripts in the installer repo and upload.
FIXME: This currently requires a local Apple Macintosh® aarch64 computer, but we could possibly automate doing it from the aarch64-darwin builder.
-
Manually Push the main/release branch directly to gerrit.
-
If this is a new major release, branch-off to
release-MAJOR
and push that branch directly to gerrit as well (FIXME: special creds for doing this as a service account so we don't need to have the gerrit perms to shoot ourselves in the foot by default because pushing to main is bad?).FIXME: automate branch-off to
release-*
branch. -
Manually (FIXME?) switch back to the release branch, which now has the correct revision.
-
Post!!
- Merge release blog post to lix-website.
- Toot about it! https://chaos.social/@lix_project
- Tweet about it! https://twitter.com/lixproject
Installer
The installer is cross-built to several systems from a Mac using
build-all.xsh
and upload-to-lix.xsh
in the installer repo (FIXME: currently
at least; maybe this should be moved here?) .
It installs a binary tarball (FIXME: it should be taught to substitute from
cache instead)
from some URL; this is the hydraJobs.binaryTarball
. The default URLs differ
by architecture and are configured here.
Infrastructure summary
- releases.lix.systems (
s3://releases
):- Each release gets a directory: https://releases.lix.systems/lix/lix-2.90-beta.1
- Binary tarballs:
nix-2.90.0-beta.1-x86_64-linux.tar.xz
, fromhydraJobs.binaryTarball
- Manifest:
manifest.nix
, an attrset of the store paths by architecture.
- Binary tarballs:
- Manifest for
nix upgrade-nix
to the latest release at/manifest.nix
.
- Each release gets a directory: https://releases.lix.systems/lix/lix-2.90-beta.1
- cache.lix.systems (
s3://cache
):- Receives all artifacts for released versions of Lix; is a plain HTTP binary cache.
- install.lix.systems (
s3://install
):~ » aws s3 ls s3://install/lix/ PRE lix-2.90-beta.0/ PRE lix-2.90-beta.1/ PRE lix-2.90.0pre20240411/ PRE lix-2.90.0pre20240412/ 2024-05-05 18:59:11 6707344 lix-installer-aarch64-darwin 2024-05-05 18:59:16 7479768 lix-installer-aarch64-linux 2024-05-05 18:59:14 7982208 lix-installer-x86_64-darwin 2024-05-05 18:59:17 8978352 lix-installer-x86_64-linux ~ » aws s3 ls s3://install/lix/lix-2.90-beta.1/ 2024-05-05 18:59:01 6707344 lix-installer-aarch64-darwin 2024-05-05 18:59:06 7479768 lix-installer-aarch64-linux 2024-05-05 18:59:03 7982208 lix-installer-x86_64-darwin 2024-05-05 18:59:07 8978352 lix-installer-x86_64-linux