forked from lix-project/lix
Make KeyedBuildResult
, BuildResult
like before, and fix bug another way
In https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/6311#discussion_r834863823, I realized since derivation goals' wanted outputs can "grow" due to overlapping dependencies (See `DerivationGoal::addWantedOutputs`, called by `Worker::makeDerivationGoalCommon`), the previous bug fix had an unfortunate side effect of causing more pointless rebuilds. In paticular, we have this situation: 1. Goal made from `DerivedPath::Built { foo, {a} }`. 2. Goal gives on on substituting, starts building. 3. Goal made from `DerivedPath::Built { foo, {b} }`, in fact is just modified original goal. 4. Though the goal had gotten as far as building, so all outputs were going to be produced, `addWantedOutputs` no longer knows that and so the goal is flagged to be restarted. This might sound far-fetched with input-addressed drvs, where we usually basically have all our goals "planned out" before we start doing anything, but with CA derivation goals and especially RFC 92, where *drv resolution* means goals are created after some building is completed, it is more likely to happen. So the first thing to do was restore the clearing of `wantedOutputs` we used to do, and then filter the outputs in `buildPathsWithResults` to only get the ones we care about. But fix also has its own side effect in that the `DerivedPath` in the `BuildResult` in `DerivationGoal` cannot be trusted; it is merely the *first* `DerivedPath` for which this goal was originally created. To remedy this, I made `BuildResult` be like it was before, and instead made `KeyedBuildResult` be a subclass wit the path. Only `buildPathsWithResults` returns `KeyedBuildResult`s, everything else just becomes like it was before, where the "key" is unambiguous from context. I think separating the "primary key" field(s) from the other fields is good practical in general anyways. (I would like to do the same thing for `ValidPathInfo`.) Among other things, it allows constructions like `std::map<Key, ThingWithKey>` where doesn't contain duplicate keys and just precludes the possibility of those duplicate keys being out of sync. We might leverage the above someday to overload `buildPathsWithResults` to take a *set* of return a *map* per the above. ----- Unfortunately, we need to avoid C++20 strictness on designated initializers. (BTW https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2287r1.html this offers some new syntax for this use-case. Hopefully this will be adopted and we can eventually use it.) No having that yet, maybe it would be better to not make `KeyedBuildResult` a subclass to just avoid this. Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9df7f3f537
commit
37fca662b0
11 changed files with 130 additions and 51 deletions
|
@ -83,11 +83,6 @@ struct BuildResult
|
|||
*/
|
||||
bool isNonDeterministic = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The derivation we built or the store path we substituted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DerivedPath path;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* For derivations, a mapping from the names of the wanted outputs
|
||||
* to actual paths.
|
||||
|
@ -116,4 +111,15 @@ struct BuildResult
|
|||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A `BuildResult` together with its "primary key".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct KeyedBuildResult : BuildResult
|
||||
{
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The derivation we built or the store path we substituted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DerivedPath path;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -330,6 +330,10 @@ void DerivationGoal::outputsSubstitutionTried()
|
|||
produced using a substitute. So we have to build instead. */
|
||||
void DerivationGoal::gaveUpOnSubstitution()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Make sure checkPathValidity() from now on checks all
|
||||
outputs. */
|
||||
wantedOutputs = OutputsSpec::All { };
|
||||
|
||||
/* The inputs must be built before we can build this goal. */
|
||||
inputDrvOutputs.clear();
|
||||
if (useDerivation)
|
||||
|
@ -570,8 +574,6 @@ void DerivationGoal::inputsRealised()
|
|||
build hook. */
|
||||
state = &DerivationGoal::tryToBuild;
|
||||
worker.wakeUp(shared_from_this());
|
||||
|
||||
buildResult = BuildResult { .path = buildResult.path };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DerivationGoal::started()
|
||||
|
@ -1452,12 +1454,28 @@ void DerivationGoal::waiteeDone(GoalPtr waitee, ExitCode result)
|
|||
{
|
||||
Goal::waiteeDone(waitee, result);
|
||||
|
||||
if (waitee->buildResult.success())
|
||||
if (auto bfd = std::get_if<DerivedPath::Built>(&waitee->buildResult.path))
|
||||
for (auto & [output, realisation] : waitee->buildResult.builtOutputs)
|
||||
if (!useDerivation) return;
|
||||
auto & fullDrv = *dynamic_cast<Derivation *>(drv.get());
|
||||
|
||||
auto * dg = dynamic_cast<DerivationGoal *>(&*waitee);
|
||||
if (!dg) return;
|
||||
|
||||
auto outputs = fullDrv.inputDrvs.find(dg->drvPath);
|
||||
if (outputs == fullDrv.inputDrvs.end()) return;
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto & outputName : outputs->second) {
|
||||
auto buildResult = dg->getBuildResult(DerivedPath::Built {
|
||||
.drvPath = dg->drvPath,
|
||||
.outputs = OutputsSpec::Names { outputName },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (buildResult.success()) {
|
||||
for (auto & [output, realisation] : buildResult.builtOutputs) {
|
||||
inputDrvOutputs.insert_or_assign(
|
||||
{ bfd->drvPath, output.outputName },
|
||||
{ dg->drvPath, output.outputName },
|
||||
realisation.outPath);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void Store::buildPaths(const std::vector<DerivedPath> & reqs, BuildMode buildMod
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<BuildResult> Store::buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> Store::buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
const std::vector<DerivedPath> & reqs,
|
||||
BuildMode buildMode,
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<Store> evalStore)
|
||||
|
@ -47,15 +47,23 @@ std::vector<BuildResult> Store::buildPathsWithResults(
|
|||
Worker worker(*this, evalStore ? *evalStore : *this);
|
||||
|
||||
Goals goals;
|
||||
for (const auto & br : reqs)
|
||||
goals.insert(worker.makeGoal(br, buildMode));
|
||||
std::vector<std::pair<const DerivedPath &, GoalPtr>> state;
|
||||
|
||||
for (const auto & req : reqs) {
|
||||
auto goal = worker.makeGoal(req, buildMode);
|
||||
goals.insert(goal);
|
||||
state.push_back({req, goal});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
worker.run(goals);
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<BuildResult> results;
|
||||
std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> results;
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto & i : goals)
|
||||
results.push_back(i->buildResult);
|
||||
for (auto & [req, goalPtr] : state)
|
||||
results.emplace_back(KeyedBuildResult {
|
||||
goalPtr->getBuildResult(req),
|
||||
/* .path = */ req,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return results;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -68,15 +76,14 @@ BuildResult Store::buildDerivation(const StorePath & drvPath, const BasicDerivat
|
|||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
worker.run(Goals{goal});
|
||||
return goal->buildResult;
|
||||
return goal->getBuildResult(DerivedPath::Built {
|
||||
.drvPath = drvPath,
|
||||
.outputs = OutputsSpec::All {},
|
||||
});
|
||||
} catch (Error & e) {
|
||||
return BuildResult {
|
||||
.status = BuildResult::MiscFailure,
|
||||
.errorMsg = e.msg(),
|
||||
.path = DerivedPath::Built {
|
||||
.drvPath = drvPath,
|
||||
.outputs = OutputsSpec::All { },
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -11,6 +11,29 @@ bool CompareGoalPtrs::operator() (const GoalPtr & a, const GoalPtr & b) const {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
BuildResult Goal::getBuildResult(const DerivedPath & req) {
|
||||
BuildResult res { buildResult };
|
||||
|
||||
if (auto pbp = std::get_if<DerivedPath::Built>(&req)) {
|
||||
auto & bp = *pbp;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Because goals are in general shared between derived paths
|
||||
that share the same derivation, we need to filter their
|
||||
results to get back just the results we care about.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto it = res.builtOutputs.begin(); it != res.builtOutputs.end();) {
|
||||
if (bp.outputs.contains(it->first.outputName))
|
||||
++it;
|
||||
else
|
||||
it = res.builtOutputs.erase(it);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void addToWeakGoals(WeakGoals & goals, GoalPtr p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (goals.find(p) != goals.end())
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -81,11 +81,26 @@ struct Goal : public std::enable_shared_from_this<Goal>
|
|||
*/
|
||||
ExitCode exitCode = ecBusy;
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Build result.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BuildResult buildResult;
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Project a `BuildResult` with just the information that pertains
|
||||
* to the given request.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In general, goals may be aliased between multiple requests, and
|
||||
* the stored `BuildResult` has information for the union of all
|
||||
* requests. We don't want to leak what the other request are for
|
||||
* sake of both privacy and determinism, and this "safe accessor"
|
||||
* ensures we don't.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BuildResult getBuildResult(const DerivedPath &);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Exception containing an error message, if any.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -93,7 +108,6 @@ struct Goal : public std::enable_shared_from_this<Goal>
|
|||
|
||||
Goal(Worker & worker, DerivedPath path)
|
||||
: worker(worker)
|
||||
, buildResult { .path = std::move(path) }
|
||||
{ }
|
||||
|
||||
virtual ~Goal()
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ struct RestrictedStore : public virtual RestrictedStoreConfig, public virtual Lo
|
|||
result.rethrow();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<BuildResult> buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
const std::vector<DerivedPath> & paths,
|
||||
BuildMode buildMode = bmNormal,
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<Store> evalStore = nullptr) override
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -287,12 +287,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
conn->to.flush();
|
||||
|
||||
BuildResult status {
|
||||
.path = DerivedPath::Built {
|
||||
.drvPath = drvPath,
|
||||
.outputs = OutputsSpec::All { },
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
BuildResult status;
|
||||
status.status = (BuildResult::Status) readInt(conn->from);
|
||||
conn->from >> status.errorMsg;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -330,7 +325,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
conn->to.flush();
|
||||
|
||||
BuildResult result { .path = DerivedPath::Opaque { StorePath::dummy } };
|
||||
BuildResult result;
|
||||
result.status = (BuildResult::Status) readInt(conn->from);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!result.success()) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,10 +125,26 @@ void write(const Store & store, Sink & out, const DrvOutput & drvOutput)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
BuildResult read(const Store & store, Source & from, Phantom<BuildResult> _)
|
||||
KeyedBuildResult read(const Store & store, Source & from, Phantom<KeyedBuildResult> _)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto path = worker_proto::read(store, from, Phantom<DerivedPath> {});
|
||||
BuildResult res { .path = path };
|
||||
auto br = worker_proto::read(store, from, Phantom<BuildResult> {});
|
||||
return KeyedBuildResult {
|
||||
std::move(br),
|
||||
/* .path = */ std::move(path),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void write(const Store & store, Sink & to, const KeyedBuildResult & res)
|
||||
{
|
||||
worker_proto::write(store, to, res.path);
|
||||
worker_proto::write(store, to, static_cast<const BuildResult &>(res));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
BuildResult read(const Store & store, Source & from, Phantom<BuildResult> _)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BuildResult res;
|
||||
res.status = (BuildResult::Status) readInt(from);
|
||||
from
|
||||
>> res.errorMsg
|
||||
|
@ -142,7 +158,6 @@ BuildResult read(const Store & store, Source & from, Phantom<BuildResult> _)
|
|||
|
||||
void write(const Store & store, Sink & to, const BuildResult & res)
|
||||
{
|
||||
worker_proto::write(store, to, res.path);
|
||||
to
|
||||
<< res.status
|
||||
<< res.errorMsg
|
||||
|
@ -865,7 +880,7 @@ void RemoteStore::buildPaths(const std::vector<DerivedPath> & drvPaths, BuildMod
|
|||
readInt(conn->from);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<BuildResult> RemoteStore::buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> RemoteStore::buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
const std::vector<DerivedPath> & paths,
|
||||
BuildMode buildMode,
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<Store> evalStore)
|
||||
|
@ -880,7 +895,7 @@ std::vector<BuildResult> RemoteStore::buildPathsWithResults(
|
|||
writeDerivedPaths(*this, conn, paths);
|
||||
conn->to << buildMode;
|
||||
conn.processStderr();
|
||||
return worker_proto::read(*this, conn->from, Phantom<std::vector<BuildResult>> {});
|
||||
return worker_proto::read(*this, conn->from, Phantom<std::vector<KeyedBuildResult>> {});
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Avoid deadlock.
|
||||
conn_.reset();
|
||||
|
@ -889,21 +904,25 @@ std::vector<BuildResult> RemoteStore::buildPathsWithResults(
|
|||
// fails, but meh.
|
||||
buildPaths(paths, buildMode, evalStore);
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<BuildResult> results;
|
||||
std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> results;
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto & path : paths) {
|
||||
std::visit(
|
||||
overloaded {
|
||||
[&](const DerivedPath::Opaque & bo) {
|
||||
results.push_back(BuildResult {
|
||||
.status = BuildResult::Substituted,
|
||||
.path = bo,
|
||||
results.push_back(KeyedBuildResult {
|
||||
{
|
||||
.status = BuildResult::Substituted,
|
||||
},
|
||||
/* .path = */ bo,
|
||||
});
|
||||
},
|
||||
[&](const DerivedPath::Built & bfd) {
|
||||
BuildResult res {
|
||||
.status = BuildResult::Built,
|
||||
.path = bfd,
|
||||
KeyedBuildResult res {
|
||||
{
|
||||
.status = BuildResult::Built
|
||||
},
|
||||
/* .path = */ bfd,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
OutputPathMap outputs;
|
||||
|
@ -952,12 +971,7 @@ BuildResult RemoteStore::buildDerivation(const StorePath & drvPath, const BasicD
|
|||
writeDerivation(conn->to, *this, drv);
|
||||
conn->to << buildMode;
|
||||
conn.processStderr();
|
||||
BuildResult res {
|
||||
.path = DerivedPath::Built {
|
||||
.drvPath = drvPath,
|
||||
.outputs = OutputsSpec::All { },
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
BuildResult res;
|
||||
res.status = (BuildResult::Status) readInt(conn->from);
|
||||
conn->from >> res.errorMsg;
|
||||
if (GET_PROTOCOL_MINOR(conn->daemonVersion) >= 29) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
void buildPaths(const std::vector<DerivedPath> & paths, BuildMode buildMode, std::shared_ptr<Store> evalStore) override;
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<BuildResult> buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
const std::vector<DerivedPath> & paths,
|
||||
BuildMode buildMode,
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<Store> evalStore) override;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum BuildMode { bmNormal, bmRepair, bmCheck };
|
|||
enum TrustedFlag : bool { NotTrusted = false, Trusted = true };
|
||||
|
||||
struct BuildResult;
|
||||
struct KeyedBuildResult;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
typedef std::map<StorePath, std::optional<ContentAddress>> StorePathCAMap;
|
||||
|
@ -575,7 +576,7 @@ public:
|
|||
* case of a build/substitution error, this function won't throw an
|
||||
* exception, but return a BuildResult containing an error message.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
virtual std::vector<BuildResult> buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
virtual std::vector<KeyedBuildResult> buildPathsWithResults(
|
||||
const std::vector<DerivedPath> & paths,
|
||||
BuildMode buildMode = bmNormal,
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<Store> evalStore = nullptr);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(, DerivedPath);
|
|||
MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(, Realisation);
|
||||
MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(, DrvOutput);
|
||||
MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(, BuildResult);
|
||||
MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(, KeyedBuildResult);
|
||||
MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(, std::optional<TrustedFlag>);
|
||||
|
||||
MAKE_WORKER_PROTO(template<typename T>, std::vector<T>);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue