forked from lix-project/lix
Maximilian Bosch
c1c37f3200
I recently got fairly confused why the following expression didn't have
any effect
{
description = "Foobar";
inputs.sops-nix = {
url = github:mic92/sops-nix;
inputs.nixpkgs_22_05.follows = "nixpkgs";
};
}
until I found out that the input was called `nixpkgs-22_05` (please note
the dash vs. underscore).
IMHO it's not a good idea to not throw an error in that case and
probably leave end-users rather confused, so I implemented a small check
for that which basically checks whether `follows`-declaration from
overrides actually have corresponding inputs in the transitive flake.
In fact this was done by accident already in our own test-suite where
the removal of a `follows` was apparently forgotten[1].
Since the key of the `std::map` that holds the `overrides` is a vector
and we have to find the last element of each vector (i.e. the override)
this has to be done with a for loop in O(n) complexity with `n` being
the total amount of overrides (which shouldn't be that large though).
Please note that this doesn't work with nested expressions, i.e.
inputs.fenix.inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "...";
which is a known problem[2].
For the expression demonstrated above, an error like this will be
thrown:
error: sops-nix has a `follows'-declaration for a non-existant input nixpkgs_22_05!
[1]
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| build-remote | ||
| libcmd | ||
| libexpr | ||
| libfetchers | ||
| libmain | ||
| libstore | ||
| libutil | ||
| nix | ||
| nix-build | ||
| nix-channel | ||
| nix-collect-garbage | ||
| nix-copy-closure | ||
| nix-env | ||
| nix-instantiate | ||
| nix-store | ||
| resolve-system-dependencies | ||
| toml11 | ||