Before the changes when building the whole system with
`contentAddressedByDefault = true;` we get many noninformative messages:
$ nix build -f nixos system --keep-going
...
warning: rewriting hashes in '/nix/store/...-clang-11.1.0.drv.chroot/nix/store/...-11.1.0'; cross fingers
warning: rewriting hashes in '/nix/store/...-clang-11.1.0.drv.chroot/nix/store/...-11.1.0-dev'; cross fingers
warning: rewriting hashes in '/nix/store/...-clang-11.1.0.drv.chroot/nix/store/...-11.1.0-python'; cross fingers
error: 2 dependencies of derivation '/nix/store/...-hub-2.14.2.drv' failed to build
warning: rewriting hashes in '/nix/store/...-subversion-1.14.1.drv.chroot/nix/store/...-subversion-1.14.1-dev'; cross fingers
warning: rewriting hashes in '/nix/store/...-subversion-1.14.1.drv.chroot/nix/store/...-subversion-1.14.1-man'; cross fingers
...
Let's downgrade these messages down to debug().
I had started the trend of doing `std::visit` by value (because a type
error once mislead me into thinking that was the only form that
existed). While the optomizer in principle should be able to deal with
extra coppying or extra indirection once the lambdas inlined, sticking
with by reference is the conventional default. I hope this might even
improve performance.
I found it somewhat confusing to have an error like
error: attribute 'getFlake' missing
if the required experimental-feature (`flakes`) is not enabled. Instead,
I'd expect Nix to throw an error just like it's the case when using e.g. `nix
flake` without `flakes` being enabled.
With this change, the error looks like this:
$ nix-instantiate -E 'builtins.getFlake "nixpkgs"'
error: Cannot call 'builtins.getFlake' because experimental Nix feature 'flakes' is disabled. You can enable it via '--extra-experimental-features flakes'.
at «string»:1:1:
1| builtins.getFlake "nixpkgs"
| ^
I didn't use `settings.requireExperimentalFeature` here on purpose
because this doesn't contain a position. Also, it doesn't seem as if we
need to catch the error and check for the missing feature here since
this already happens at evaluation time.
This actually bit me quite recently in `nixpkgs` because I assumed that
`nix-build --check` would also error out if hashes don't match anymore[1]
and so I wrongly assumed that I couldn't reproduce the mismatch error.
The fix is rather simple, during the output registration a so-called
`delayedException` is instantiated e.g. if a FOD hash-mismatch occurs.
However, in case of `nix-build --check` (or `--rebuild` in case of `nix
build`), the code-path where this exception is thrown will never be
reached.
By adding that check to the if-clause that causes an early exit in case
of `bmCheck`, the issue is gone. Also added a (previously failing)
test-case to demonstrate the problem.
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/139238, the underlying issue
was that `nix-prefetch-git` returns different hashes than `fetchgit`
because the latter one fetches submodules by default.
This fixes
$ nix path-info -r $(type -P ls)
/nix/store/vfilzcp8a467w3p0mp54ybq6bdzb8w49-coreutils-8.32
/nix/store/5d821pjgzb90lw4zbg6xwxs7llm335wr-libunistring-0.9.10
...
/nix/store/mrv4y369nw6hg4pw8d9p9bfdxj9pjw0x-acl-2.3.0
/nix/store/vfilzcp8a467w3p0mp54ybq6bdzb8w49-coreutils-8.32
Also, output the paths in topologically sorted order like we used to.
This is important if the remote side *does* execute
nix-store/nix-daemon successfully, but stdout is polluted
(e.g. because the remote user's bashrc script prints something to
stdout). In that case we have to shutdown the write side to force the
remote nix process to exit.
Instead of
error: serialised integer 7161674624452356180 is too large for type 'j'
we now get
error: 'nix-store --serve' protocol mismatch from 'sshtest@localhost', got 'This account is currently not available.'
Fixes https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/37287.
It's now disabled by default for the following:
* 'nix search' (this was already implied by read-only mode)
* 'nix flake show'
* 'nix flake check', but only on the hydraJobs output
Without this, flakes within the same tree and same lock data will have
the same fingerprint and the eval cache for one flake will be
incorrectly used for another.
Alternative to #4639. You can still read flake.lock, but at least in
reproducible workflows like NixOS configurations where you require a
non-dirty tree, evaluation will fail because there is no rev.
With --no-write-lock-file, it's possible that flake.lock is out of
sync with the actual inputs used by the evaluation. So doing fromJSON
(readFile ./flake.lock) will give wrong results.
Fixes#4639.
Alex Kladov
Sergei Trofimovich
Maximilian Bosch