forked from lix-project/lix
Robert Hensing
ea30f152b7
When explicitly requested by the caller, as suggested in the meeting (https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/8090#issuecomment-1531139324) > @edolstra: { toPath } vs { fromPath } is too implicit I've opted for the `inputAddressed = true` requirement, because it we did not agree on renaming the path attributes. > @roberth: more explicit > @edolstra: except for the direction; not immediately clear in which direction the rewriting happens This is in fact the most explicit syntax and a bit redundant, which is good, because that redundancy lets us deliver an error message that reminds expression authors that CA provides a better experience to their users. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| build-remote | ||
| libcmd | ||
| libexpr | ||
| libfetchers | ||
| libmain | ||
| libstore | ||
| libutil | ||
| nix | ||
| nix-build | ||
| nix-channel | ||
| nix-collect-garbage | ||
| nix-copy-closure | ||
| nix-env | ||
| nix-instantiate | ||
| nix-store | ||
| resolve-system-dependencies | ||
| toml11 | ||