2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
title: "About Lix"
|
|
|
|
description: "A strictly-better implementation of the Nix language."
|
|
|
|
date: "2024-04-27"
|
|
|
|
author: "Lix Team"
|
|
|
|
---
|
2024-04-27 03:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
**Lix** is an implementation of the Nix _functional package management_ language. Originally
|
|
|
|
codified by [cppnix](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/), the Nix language allows you to create
|
|
|
|
packages that can be used for anything from **putting configuration files into place** to
|
|
|
|
**declaratively managing an entire system**.
|
2024-04-27 03:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
That means that, with a few well-written Nix expressions, one
|
|
|
|
can easily configure a system into a known state -- and the packages that are created this
|
|
|
|
way are guaranteed to run _exactly the same way_ on any system of the same architecture.
|
2024-04-27 03:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
As a fork of _cppnix_, Lix is designed to be fully compatible with the original cppnix
|
|
|
|
implementation -- but also designed to allow evolution of the language and tooling, so
|
|
|
|
its developers can improve usability and ergonomics without sacrificing correctness.
|
2024-04-27 03:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
### Why use Nix?
|
2024-04-27 03:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
If you're not familiar with the Nix approach, we recommend checking out some of the
|
|
|
|
[writing on the subject](https://nixos.org/guides/nix-pills/01-why-you-should-give-it-a-try.html).
|
2024-04-27 03:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-04-28 00:33:52 +00:00
|
|
|
## Why Lix?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The **Nix language** is used for a variety of applications ranging from individual computers
|
|
|
|
to clusters of critical infrastructure. With this in mind, the Lix team has been working to
|
|
|
|
provide a collection of necessary improvements over _cppnix_:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Built for a community, not for a corporation.**
|
|
|
|
Lix is built by a team of open-source volunteers -- and exists to provide a alternative to the
|
|
|
|
commercial interests that have long plagued both upstream _cppnix_ and corporate-authored forks.
|
|
|
|
We're proud to stand by our open [conflict of interest statement](/team#conflicts-of-interest),
|
|
|
|
and proud to listen to community voices on issues of sponsorship, direction, and moderation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **A safe community for developers of all backgrounds.**
|
|
|
|
Lix is developed by a diverse group of users -- and accordingly is committed to providing a
|
|
|
|
space that's safe for users and developers typically underrepresented in technical projects.
|
|
|
|
We take moderation seriously, and are committed to preventing bad actors from driving out
|
|
|
|
marginalized groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **A correct implementation of the Nix language.**
|
|
|
|
Recent versions of the _cppnix_ project have introduced significant regressions -- so much so
|
|
|
|
that the upstream [Nixpkgs](https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs) team has opted to remain several
|
|
|
|
versions behind. Lix is forked from the last truly-stable version of _cppnix_ -- but has both
|
|
|
|
introduced new features and backported a number of features from newer versions without
|
|
|
|
sacrificing correctness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **A more modern implementation of Nix.**
|
|
|
|
Lix is designed for evolution of its codebase. Lix already uses the more modern
|
|
|
|
[meson build system](https://mesonbuild.com/), which improves developer usability and decreases build times.
|
|
|
|
Plans include a gradual, piecewise introduction of the memory-safe [Rust](https://www.rust-lang.org/)
|
|
|
|
programming language -- to both supplement and replace sections of the current C++ codebase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **A language with room to grow.**
|
|
|
|
Unlike upstream Nix, Lix intends to be an evolving language -- a robust [language versioning](/roadmap)
|
|
|
|
system will allow the language to grow and evolve without sacrificing backwards-compatibility or correctness.
|
|
|
|
And room to grow means room for [usability and ergonomics improvements](#) -- both in the langauge and in
|
|
|
|
tooling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Frequently Asked Questions (relatively speaking)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: Can I use my existing Nix/NixOS configuration?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely. A primary goal of the Lix project is compatibility, which means that we very much support
|
|
|
|
using Lix in any existing Nix or NixOS configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check out the [install page](/install) to see how to use Lix with your existing configurations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: If Lix plans to adopt Rust, what makes it different from Tvix?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike Lix, [Tvix](https://tvix.dev/) is a ground-up re-implementation of the Nix language in Rust,
|
|
|
|
which shares many of the same modernization goals as Lix -- but also has a long way to go before it can
|
|
|
|
reach feature parity (and parity in correctness) with the _cppnix_ and Lix implementations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lix instead plans a _top-down_, _piecewise_ approach to our Rust extensions and replacements -- which means
|
|
|
|
that Lix already has feature-parity with -- and correctness exceeding -- the original _cppnix_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: What are your plans for flakes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of our primary goals is compatibility. While flakes are an experimental technology, their use is
|
|
|
|
widespread enough that they've become a de-facto part of the Nix ecosystem -- and thus we consider them
|
|
|
|
to be part of our compatibility guarantee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That said, we're not tied to any particular flake implementation. As Lix develops, we plan on adding an
|
|
|
|
extension system for the tooling -- which will allow technologies like flakes, as well as new and different
|
|
|
|
extensions -- to seamlessly act with the Lix core without needing to reside long-term in the Lix tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: What relation does Lix have to the Nix Foundation, and to related projects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Besides being a fork of _cppnix_ and an implementation of the Nix language, Lix is the
|
|
|
|
effort of a number of long-time Nix, Nixpkgs, NixOS, and Tvix contributors and maintainers -- and has
|
|
|
|
been developed in partnership with a number of prolific Nix-documenters, bloggers, and users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We welcome anyone who wants to develop for both Lix and another implementation -- including _cppnix_ and _Tvix_,
|
|
|
|
and our permissive open-source absolutely allows any developer to integrate our code into any
|
|
|
|
license-compatible project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, ___Lix does not fall under the NixOS Foundation umbrella___, is funded independently of the foundation,
|
|
|
|
and is not in any way controlled by its leadership. Unfortunately, at the moment, this is currently vital for
|
|
|
|
us to deliver on our promise of a safe and inclusive community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: What does the name Lix stand for? How is it pronounced?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like Nix, Lix isn't really short for anything. The name originally derives from the term _Layered Nix_,
|
|
|
|
based on the premise of layering new language and tooling features atop a fully-compatible, rock-solid base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lix is pronounced like _licks_ -- i.e. what you might do if someone handed you a delicious ice cream cone;
|
|
|
|
which may or may not be stacked up with lambdas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: Can I help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely! We love new contributors, and are always looking for contributions in all of our areas -- and
|
|
|
|
we value contributions of more than just code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head over to the [contributing](/contributing) page to get started.
|