In f047e4357b, I missed the behavior that if
building without a dedicated build user (i.e. in single-user setups), seccomp
setup failures are silently ignored. This was introduced without explanation 7
years ago (ff6becafa8). Hopefully the only
use-case nowadays is causing spurious test suite successes when messing up the
seccomp filter during development. Let's try removing it.
Change-Id: Ibe51416d9c7a6dd635c2282990224861adf1ceab
alois31
865a2f6448
